puppycodes

4 ms·

1.
by puppycodes 5d ago
Once again its not as simple as oh its easy now. It's highly dependent on how much time has passed, who you are, what your worried about... etc... making it out like everyone is on the same plane makes the threat assessment worthless.
2.
by puppycodes 5d ago
"Access" is not what you think it means. This is marketing hype directly from their site. I have first hand experience using their extractors and its not as robust as they make it sound. They extract metadata outside of the encryp
3.
by puppycodes 5d ago
This is true for literally everything encrypted. Security is always a function of time and effort. The name of the game is being not worth the effort.
4.
by puppycodes 5d ago
Thats not at all accurate. When you say "resisting" you are glossing over really important distinctions. The lastest versions of iOS are perfectly capable of being locked down in a such a way that they are not able to be penetrate
5.
by puppycodes 8d ago
Have not heard this, whats your source? I don't see how they could determine that because "its a new phone" is hard to dispute. best case scenario is that a higher court overturns this but not holding my breath.
6.
by puppycodes 8d ago
Not really. Cellebrite isn't magic. If you have an up to date OS and a strong password not pin, encryption functions as it should. The best thing to do is simply have a travel phone.
7.
by puppycodes 10d ago
terrible idea... but im sure it will popular with 60 year olds watermarking their pictures of sunsets.
8.
by puppycodes 14d ago
"The evidence from human studies is based on observational data (which cannot prove that the link with cancer is causal). But experimental studies in animals point in the same direction." in mice strikes again
9.
by puppycodes 1mo ago
Anna's Archive is a gift to humanity
10.
by puppycodes 2mo ago
lol this is a really good idea.
11.
by puppycodes 2mo ago
Parents certainly care about all the things I mentioned, it even impacts their kids. This approach to safeguard kids online is completely impractical and utterly unenforceable and seems like a total waste of time.
12.
by puppycodes 3mo ago
There is no way to enforce any of these types of laws without an iron curtain that clearly violates the first amendment. If you have free speech infront of children in public I don't see how having infinite scroll on your website or ap
13.
by puppycodes 3mo ago
buying a new car gets less attractive every year.
14.
by puppycodes 3mo ago
That is hilarious and an amazing find.
15.
by puppycodes 3mo ago
Excellent, I wonder how this might impact things like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48467712
16.
by puppycodes 4mo ago
Good idea for sure
17.
by puppycodes 4mo ago
There are very few ways to fight stuff like this and 100% agree this is a good one. I predict we are gonna need so much more of this type of obfuscation to just live our lives normally.
18.
by puppycodes 4mo ago
This is essentially a wiretap. It's illegal in most states to place a listening device in public that captures private conversations, this is basically no different.
19.
by puppycodes 4mo ago
Thats a good explination. It does seem extremely noisy and not at all practical for fingerprinting a user compared to other methods. If you have javascript enabled assume you can be fingerprinted.
20.
by puppycodes 4mo ago
The crash lawsuit writes itself
21.
by puppycodes 5mo ago
This was my thought as well, a good excuse for a slush fund.
22.
by puppycodes 5mo ago
Both systems can be bad for different reasons. I'm not making any comparisons.
23.
by puppycodes 5mo ago
Personally I enjoy the basic human rights of privacy and freedom of speech which are deeply lacking in the UK system.
24.
by puppycodes 5mo ago
another feature of UK dystopia
25.
by puppycodes 5mo ago
All i'm saying is its very very difficult to maintain over time as email is largely monopolized. If you send a lot of emails to a lot of different addresses its notoriously difficult to maintain a good server reputation.
26.
by puppycodes 6mo ago
- anti-social behaviour orders (ASBO) - Public Order Act 1986 - John William Gott / Blasphemy Laws - Public Order Offences: Using "threatening, abusive or insulting" words in public - Lèse-majesté laws / Seditious Libel
27.
by puppycodes 6mo ago
The UK gets more absurd by the day. Unfortunately this is a well established part of their history to criminalize speech they find distasteful.
28.
by puppycodes 6mo ago
unfortunately hosting your own email server is nearly impossible if you want reliable delivery. If you don't care about being put in the spam box then it can work.
29.
by puppycodes 6mo ago
Yeah same 100%
30.
by puppycodes 6mo ago
I'm not suprised Raycast is involved in this marketing scheme. They pollute their own product with ads where they shouldn't be. Whoever is running their marketing team needs a lesson in not pissing off your userbase.

More ›