publicmenace

5 ms·

1.
by publicmenace 4y ago
You leftists are really something to behold. Undeterred by facts, I'm sure you will continue to spread bullshit on this website and refuse to acknowledge your errors.
2.
by publicmenace 4y ago
Tesla's earnings have absolutely nothing to do with how much this guy deserves to get.
3.
by publicmenace 4y ago
Yes. Punitive damages are not appropriate to begin with in this case, and certainly not that high.
4.
by publicmenace 4y ago
Lol if you made any of these arguments to a lawyer they'd laugh at you. That's not how damages are supposed to work, not at all.
5.
by publicmenace 4y ago
There was nothing in the rules prohibiting the terminal price. And the letter of course says that. That doesn’t mean it’s their real motive or a correct conclusion.
6.
by publicmenace 4y ago
> if this was some kind of stunt pulled by the FCC, SpaceX can sue. but in reality, this was exactly by the book and SpaceX accepted it Again wrong. SpaceX in fact has already appealed the decision to the full Commission. But the chairw
7.
by publicmenace 4y ago
No this is not the same thing they’ve done for decades. You just make that assertion but it’s not true. It’s not some crazy conspiracy. This is the whole point of winning elections. The people in charge of tech policy in this admin want uni
8.
by publicmenace 4y ago
> the fcc is allowed to take their money back if your service is going in a downward trend. That’s not quite right. They can take it if they conclude you will not meet the target . Ups and downs on the way there are totally fine under
9.
by publicmenace 4y ago
Because that’s how the RDOF program was designed. You have a number of years to meet your targets in exchange for the subsidies to help you do it.
10.
by publicmenace 4y ago
They didn't have to meet any performance targets until 2024 at the earliest so that was a bogus justification. They were fairly close but were cutting performance a bit to reach more customers pending the launch of more satellites. And
11.
by publicmenace 4y ago
Almost all of Starlink’s competitors are completely dependent on government money. The FCC spends billions a year cutting checks to rural ISPs to subsidize them. The FCC took Starlink’s subsidies away because the Biden admin hates Musk now.
12.
by publicmenace 4y ago
So that's a whole other debate (and I disagree), but even if you're right, getting rid of cars would be a gradual, multi-decade project. It's just not possible to get around modern American cities without cars. You can't
13.
by publicmenace 4y ago
E-Scooters are a public menace. They're way to fast for the sidewalk, dangerous on the road, litter the sidewalks and cause people to trip, and are almost always ridden unsafely, with no safety equipment at all. Get these death traps o