psychiatrist24

5 ms·

1.
by psychiatrist24 5y ago
In the case of the supermarket, the person who is banned could pay somebody else to buy stuff for them. In an extreme case, that somebody would have to be the government preventing the person from starving. In general I think private busine
2.
by psychiatrist24 5y ago
Same way as in other weather.
3.
by psychiatrist24 5y ago
1.5 miles is doable by bicycle. Bridges or tunnels can be built for crossing roads and freeways.
4.
by psychiatrist24 5y ago
Of course that supermarket should be entitled to ban the misbehaving person from their store. To turn the story around, why should a business that takes it on itself to provide for a remote community be punished for it by forcing them to ac
5.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Should be easy to check by comparing applications for immigration.
6.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
4Head??
7.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
I rather consider your kind of argument to be hand wavy. "Some people simply have no options or opportunities whatsoever". Can you provide some actual examples? And what is even the point to talk about those hypothetical people? S
8.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
A deep learning network consists of hundreds of thousands of nodes, and it is becoming more (I didn't look up the actual number). You can show the weights of the connections between the nodes, but that wouldn't really help anybody
9.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Time and money can be managed. If you don't have enough money, look for a better job (it might help against the time issues, too). To change schools, you might have to move anyway, so you might as well look for a job somewhere else. If
10.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
This is not an issue of concentrated private wealth. Most schools are run by governments. You are right, citizens need to be empowered against their governments. But regulations give governments more power, not less. And if you say the majo
11.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
I'm also an European, and I disagree strongly. Not everybody in Europe is a socialist. The only thing that guarantees fair treatment is competition (so that for example a worker can quit and work somewhere else). Government rules just
12.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Schools are already shit in many ways. What is your answer to that? Just wait out the years and hope for the right politicians to be elected and change it? They might give your kids diversity training and teach them they are unworthy scum.
13.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Can you explain what goes on in human brains?
14.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Just don't send your kids to a school that uses such technology, and don't work for employers that use it. If you cry for regulation, it is a sign that government has too much power. But more regulation gives governments even more
15.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
I don't trust the news, but on FB and Twitter I can select my own sources. Doesn't mean I automatically trust them, but at least I can get a multitude of perspectives and background information that the news omits.
16.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Yeah, my first thought "another build manager to worry about" - it's already annoying that some projects use Gradle, which I don't want to have to learn.
17.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
But maybe you are now like the turkey who thinks everything is fine, and then it gets eaten at the end of the year. You might wake up in Socialism one day, with a mob outside of your house wanting to evict you.
18.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
There just don't seem to be many restrooms around. And even if the schedule allows for it, maybe the bottle saves time and drivers could opt for it simply to get home sooner.
19.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
If a driver decides to pee into a bottle, what is Amazon supposed to do about it?
20.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Were they not invented as insurance?
21.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Any suggestions?
22.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
But you mentioned things that were flat out wrong or harmful. I think the fundamental misunderstanding is that scientism is science.
23.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
With physics perhaps it is refinement, but the example of the OP was diet, wasn't it? Changing from "fat is bad" to "fat is healthy" or whatever is not refining or iterating.
24.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
But if you have witnessed that, wouldn't it be prudent to remain doubtful about any new advice coming from the field? After all, the probability of it being thrown out in the future seems to be almost 100%?
25.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
I read it again and no, it doesn't. It claims that certain things the author happens to believe in are rejected by the GOP. I think anybody who claims to represent "the science" or "scientists" already should be mis
26.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
It wasn't my intention to discuss any of those beliefs, just to list examples of anti-science beliefs among leftists. If you believe critical race theory is science, OK - it's not the subject of this thread, I suppose. The only re
27.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
Stopped reading at "a key feature of the political right" - the political left has adopted many anti-scientific ideas, too (if you want an example, take gender ideology and critical race theory, or belief that socialism works). Pe
28.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
"public knowledge" - I don't know about his exploits, and I am part of the public. I repeatedly said I can not defend him because I don't know enough about him. But I can comment on the attacks that are being launched. I
29.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
The first article says poverty rate is 11%, which just goes to show that the "400$ expense story" is misleading (making it sound as if 40% were in trouble). I don't have time to read the details, but "poverty" is al
30.
by psychiatrist24 6y ago
That is just the same story, which is based on a survey. At least it mentions that many people would decide to pay for such an expense with credit, even though they would have the cash. And just because some person has financial issues, the

More ›