proc0

12 ms·

151.
by proc0 1y ago
I assume it's reproduceable. He's using a philosophical argument called the Kalam cosmological argument for the existence of God. So it's not just a random conversation, and Alex is a philosophy guy so he knows how to lead t
152.
by proc0 1y ago
It's not fake, Alex explains at the end. It's a legit philosophy channel.
153.
by proc0 1y ago
I think assistants is a good descriptions. There are several sci-fi universes where there exists these two kinds of AI, one is like what we have now (which is already incredible really) and the other is AI that has sentience and doesn'
154.
I Made ChatGPT Believe in God (Seriously) [video](youtube.com)
2 points by proc0 1y ago|5 comments
155.
by proc0 1y ago
> Why would an intelligence machine need to behave like we are? Because we need to communicate with it. That's the difference between machines that do physical work and machines that do cognitive work. A lot of this has to do with i
156.
by proc0 1y ago
1) it's expensive to have AI output millions of emails, assuming it's tailored somehow and not just a template 2) AI is already in place to detect spam, so it's AI vs AI and it's probably more expensive on the attacker s
157.
by proc0 1y ago
Try Raylib. It doesn't sound like you'll need much more than progressively using more advanced libraries, and Raylib is an excellent beginner graphics library. You'll want C or C++ even though it has bindings for a lot of lan
158.
by proc0 1y ago
The difference here is that there wouldn't even be a need for Raphael, at least if all the projections are right as to where AI is going. Replacing humans with other humans is one thing. Replacing humans with machines is on a completel
159.
by proc0 1y ago
> while AI excels at pattern matching, true innovation—creating entirely new paradigms—remains human. If humans remain in the loop, the promise of AI is broken. The alternative is that AI is still narrow AI and we're just applying i
160.
by proc0 1y ago
One recurring pattern I see with the current AI predictions is a kind of contradicting idea of AI being really intelligent agents, but also AI needs to be checked carefully. Either they're intelligent enough to not need humans or we ar
161.
by proc0 1y ago
My mental model has been increasingly one of mining minerals or gems. Prompting and iterating is like slowly chipping away the rock of a deep cave with a pickaxe. You then find a gem after many different prompts. Eventually you exhaust that
162.
by proc0 1y ago
I think I've already given sufficient logic to demonstrate LLMs don't "reason" like humans (whatever it is we want to call "reason", it is not the same). You keep using "hallucinate" to compare LLMs a
163.
by proc0 1y ago
> Making shit up and being wrong is not an hallucination because it comes from humans? Yes. And no, I am not "hallucinating" this text even if it's wrong. I have a structured pattern of thoughts with beliefs. LLMs don&#x27
164.
by proc0 1y ago
I said "you can" derive, and I could add "in theory" in the casual sense. I don't have access to these large models, or the training or the time to really analyze these large models to an extent that I can derive th
165.
by proc0 1y ago
Well no, most people can reason without writing or speaking. I can just think and reason about anything. Not sure what you mean. Reasoning is something like structured thoughts. You have a series of thoughts that build on each other to prod
166.
by proc0 1y ago
You can derive #3 from first principles of how the underlying gradient descent and backpropagation work. They approximate functions, therefore when it gets something wrong it means something went wrong with either the gradient descent or ba
167.
by proc0 1y ago
Absolutely, they're being hyped to the extreme talking about how it's AGI in the next two years, yet I cannot get one of them to generate a jar with no lid. It just creates the lid every single time, but that's just an exampl
168.
by proc0 1y ago
Studies like this should make it evident that LLMs are not reasoning at all. An AI that would reason like humans would also make mistakes like humans and by now we can all see that LLM mistakes are completely random and nonsensical. It is a
169.
by proc0 1y ago
I had to hack my windows with some shady regex i found in order to stop constant and forced updates because of things like this (although this is not a big deal but they add up and it's only a matter of time until they release an updat
170.
by proc0 1y ago
Probably something to do with YT algorithm and/or guidelines. YT definitely pushes certain length videos, not sure if it's 5 or 10min for example. Then youtubers min/max the algorithm so it becomes a trend.
171.
by proc0 1y ago
What the article describes is an approach to gaming similar to how software apps in general are approached. This doesn't work. Games are inherently about a challenge, they are not just interactive software where you press buttons and t
172.
by proc0 1y ago
I'm very skeptical on codex. Simple apps, sure. Even a little complexity? Probably full of issues that need to be checked and fixed. This isn't about rate of progress anymore because we're not advancing in some of the most ba
173.
by proc0 1y ago
This has to be the way to fix the most exploitative elements of capitalism. If EVERYONE works 4 hours then isn't it the case that everything would balance itself out, with exception of technological advancements. Maybe you don't g
174.
by proc0 1y ago
Not quite. It's even admitted in the article which is a bit of a contradiction: > This is, in my opinion, the biggest problem of "vibe coding": The AI metaprograms for you, but then you need to actually maintain the genera
175.
by proc0 1y ago
I'm very skeptical. I see all the hype, listen to people say it's 2 more years until coding is fully automated but it's hard for me to believe seeing how the current models get stuck and have severe limitations despite a lot
176.
by proc0 1y ago
> People get hired to fill a role. Why should the employee care deeply about the company if the company just treats the employee like an asset in return? I'm just pointing out the double standard. I'm ok with caring about the c
177.
by proc0 1y ago
> Overall, he says, the number of people playing premium titles isn't increasing, but the cost of making them is. I don't buy this. I think it's in part mismanagement. There are so many more tools to make games these days,
178.
by proc0 1y ago
Companies have no loyalty towards employees, especially large companies, with only the people who sacrifice the most having a semblance of job security. If you want to limit your hours every day, or draw lines around your role, then you ine
179.
by proc0 1y ago
Gaming is in a weird spot. I used to think everyone would be gaming by now but it seems we're still in this place where gaming is about shooting or playing arcade games with the occasional story driven AAA title. I'm guessing desp
180.
by proc0 1y ago
It's going to take some company taking a huge hit from some bug or failure caused by AI for the bubble to burst. Current LLMs have made huge leaps but their biggest downside is the lack of "real time" learning that allows for

More ›