pretentious7

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pretentious7 4y ago

   Thanks for the link! It's actually rendering to Dom huh... Interesting.
2. 2.▲
   by pretentious7 4y ago

   Yep! (It's annoyingly nontrivial to do with gpu acceleration, but we'll have a guide out as soon as we figure it out) (I work at drifting in space)
3. 3.▲
   by pretentious7 4y ago

   I have also been having some rather inexplicable issues with paying oracle, it's really strange.
4. 4.▲
   Donors to the FreeBSD Foundation(freebsdfoundation.org)

   1 points by pretentious7 5y ago|0 comments
5. 5.▲
   by pretentious7 5y ago

   But there's a lot of eccentrics whose life is the internet. To disconnect for them is essentially the same as solitary confinement. Insofar as privacy, compartmentalization, and good opsec, near did all of that, doesn't help when
6. 6.▲
   by pretentious7 5y ago

   1776 hosting is run by the KF site admin.
7. 7.▲
   by pretentious7 5y ago

   https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPe... Here's some benchmarks. But in summary, for small simple hot loops, chrome is just as fast using js, but for firefox wasm gives b
8. 8.▲
   by pretentious7 5y ago

   Does it still 404? Sorry I made some mistake with it. Theres a link in the post to an interactive demo. The reason I said fastest is cause I wrote the hot loop with SIMD instructions. I'll be adding in period checking and stuff in a co
9. 9.▲
   by pretentious7 5y ago

   https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPe... We did that! Yea chrome basically keeps right up, of course not accounting for SIMD
10. 10.▲
    by pretentious7 5y ago

    ( https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPe... ) OP was very useful for us in optimizing our js vs wasm benchmarks. We were wondering what a very simple parallel problem like mandel