https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPerformance.html https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPe... Here's some benchmar

https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPerformance.html https://blog.feather.systems/jekyll/update/2021/06/21/WasmPe... Here's some benchmarks. But in summary, for small simple hot loops, chrome is just as fast using js, but for firefox wasm gives big performance improvements. Of course, if you can use SIMD instructions, then wasm will win, but that's less fair.