Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
preordained
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
preordained
5y ago
Be irrational?
92.
▲
by
preordained
5y ago
I would say my most practical experience with increasing situational awareness came from getting into competitive Magic the Gathering. Misreading a card or a line of play = loss many times; it is very easy to miss a key variable on the boar
93.
▲
by
preordained
5y ago
Clojure with usual suspects; e.g. Ring, etc.
94.
▲
by
preordained
5y ago
Could not agree more...I wish I had more of substance to add, but an upvote didn't feel sufficient
95.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Humans, who are social animals, not being able to see/read each other's faces in person...forever?
96.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
That's part of being uncensored. Small price to pay, IMO
97.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Ya think... I can't understand those who think we are on a sustainable trajectory or (even worse in some ways) the "we'll keep trying lockdowns until we get it 'right'" camp. It's not working, adjust.
98.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
God, yes...JavaScript is the great "stick a bandaid on it" story of tech
99.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Seriously. That's a WTF from me, dawg...
100.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Said better than I could--much agreed.
101.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
This seems logical, but I've yet to experience a software shop of any complexity where you can just plug people in and out with this mercenary approach. A year or two is when I notice people actually start adding significant value, and
102.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
I've felt this way for a while, that we're just spinning our wheels. UIs/lipstick gets prettier, but there is little out there we couldn't of had 10-20 years ago. Ergonomics of software development have made great stride
103.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Everyone who is answering in the negative here, no matter how sincere and what efforts they are making to discuss this rationally is getting downvoted. A. Why? Can we not act like this? B. Off topic, but whoever thought the downvote button
104.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Because, saying "look at the other guy" isn't a solution
105.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
If the code was initially a net positive (i.e. provided a feature users wanted/needed, etc.), then in a way, yes. It might be bad in the abstract in the way patching something with bubblegum is, but if it works at the time--it works. I
106.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Fine, porn or gore or profanity, list of slurs. If you want to begin curating other nebulous concepts like "hate speech" at scale, it should be explicitly defined and you should held to being clear when you are acting upon violati
107.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
When, I don't know, +90% of public discourse is flowing through a handful of platforms, and they are cutting out what they don't like, teasing out what they do like a gardener sculpting shrubbery to present some customized, skewed
108.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
I find it disturbing that a post like this gets downvoted. You've said nothing off-the-wall here. A downvote is not a rebuttal or an unceremonious verdict on the validity of your thoughts. Seriously not a fan of downvotes for this reas
109.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Spoken like a blue mage ;)
110.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
The Waste Land might be the most pretentious thing I've ever read. It just oozes self-importance. I've never seen any work that could be described as great that has an overt peacocking quality to it.
111.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
What? Not without extra pay, that's for damn sure...not just "some" companies. That's ridiculous. I got overtime when I worked retail for crying out loud...
112.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
A part of me feels bad sometimes cause I doubt I'm good enough for some FAANG company...then I read stuff like this and I think, yah, ability or no, I don't think I'm type of person who would want to partake in this culture.
113.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
So, I looked at the article they are refuting (or one of them?) and expected a bunch of superficial criticism as suggested in this refutation, but it does not look to me at all that "superficial" criticism is being defended agains
114.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
The Disappearance of the Universe, Gary Renard
115.
▲
by
preordained
6y ago
Yah, I have to say material like this getting any attention really accentuates the feeling I get that we're scraping the bottom of the barrel for how to improve in software. It seems like we're more and more focused on the (relati
116.
▲
by
preordained
7y ago
100% true. No idea why you were downvoted.
117.
▲
by
preordained
7y ago
As an experiment, you should let one rip at an opportune moment. Should be enlightening whether they carry on as if this is indeed normal or try to gaslight you about your strange behavior...
118.
▲
by
preordained
7y ago
The love to work for work's sake bit...I get what you are saying. But >Many of them also been with the same company for 30+ years which is insane! Why is this insane? More and more unusual these days, yes, but what is insane on the
119.
▲
by
preordained
7y ago
I get what you are saying, and on a certain practical level you are right, you can't be that guy who never moved past COBOL...but I think it needs to be super clear that you can accept the churn (as necessary) but you sure as hell do
120.
▲
by
preordained
7y ago
Who needs em? Everyone ;)
More ›