So, I looked at the article they are refuting (or one of them?) and expected a bunch of superficial criticism as suggested in this refutation, but it does not l

So, I looked at the article they are refuting (or one of them?) and expected a bunch of superficial criticism as suggested in this refutation, but it does not look to me at all that "superficial" criticism is being defended against: https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/ https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/ ^^^Swallow your politics if you can for a moment and read. At a minimum it seems that the rebuttal here was being argued in very bad faith. Given the stage set, I was expecting bikeshedding about the Law if Demeter or JSON vs other format, etc...