pknopf

44 ms·

451.
by pknopf 9y ago
The base docker images ( https://github.com/godarch/distributions ) only supports x86_64. Docker images have support for having multiple embedded rootfs tarballs for multiple platforms, but it gets complicated. Maybe in
452.
by pknopf 9y ago
By the sounds of it, you could do this currently. 1) Create a root image for your use that installs Salt in your Arch image. See here: https://github.com/pauldotknopf/darch-recipes/blob/master/ba... 2) F
453.
by pknopf 9y ago
I'm not familiar with Salt, but it looks interesting! Does Salt allow you to run from an already-built (but minimal) Arch installation? The base Darch images (godarch/arch) is bootstrapped manually. Would I have to create a godarc
454.
by pknopf 9y ago
With Darch (I'm the author), you can use VoidLinux with a replicated setup. Also, each boot is a clean boot (tempfs overlay). This ensures you capture your OS changes through your build script. https://godarch.com/ Thi
455.
by pknopf 9y ago
Hey guys. FYI, Darch (my project) has support for VoidLinux. https://godarch.com/concepts/recipes/distributions/
456.
by pknopf 9y ago
I have a similar diet. In the morning, I drink a slimfast. The high protein helps keep my hunger quenched. I'll eat a small bar for lunch. Then, I'll have a normal dinner. Also, I've cut out all soda and sugar from my diet. I
457.
by pknopf 9y ago
You could replace Travis with Gitlab, since you are using AppVeyor for Windows anyway. With GitLab ci, you can run their "gitlab-runner" command locally pretty easily. I use it often to check my builds before actually pushing. It&
458.
by pknopf 9y ago
If I could produce the same sounds with cheaper equipment in a fraction of the time, what makes this experiment worthy? Spoiler alert, it's the buzz around ML.
459.
by pknopf 9y ago
> It seems pretty intellectually shallow to me. So does spending a crazy amount of time and tech to implement something that could be done in other existing synthesizers with a fraction of the time/effort, just so that you can say &
460.
by pknopf 9y ago
Yeah, it seems like a lot of work and technical know-how to make something that doesn't really sound new. Seems more like a hipster-ish take on making music. "I only make music on instruments that I can build myself."
461.
by pknopf 9y ago
GC's have some kind of inherit reference counting which makes releasing pointers safe, in any direction. You can't do that with C/C++ without something like glib.
462.
by pknopf 9y ago
Each module has to have it's own GC. In my experience, it's been easier to integrate two languages that have GC (JavaScript and Go) than two languages where only one is GC'd (JavaScript and Rust). What will the interop with R
463.
by pknopf 9y ago
Go is making a large push to wasm as well. There is a branch/fork with a near complete wasm Go compiler. I'm interested in seeing how Rust and Go will compare in the future of the web. Who will win? ;)
464.
by pknopf 9y ago
People gripe at Go's error checking, claiming it's verbose, etc. But, I like it. Fully and clearly expressed intent for the handling of errors.
465.
by pknopf 9y ago
I'd say it's generally true with their native projects (C/C++). With their higher level stuff, they do a lot better.
466.
by pknopf 9y ago
What is the purpose of this? Just static analysis? If that is it, you'd probably be better off just using the PHP parser ( https://github.com/nikic/PHP-Parser ). If you are writing analyzers for PHP, you must know i
467.
by pknopf 9y ago
Do people use Nix for building and deploying project dependencies? Example project? Can you consume the result in a format that isn't all Nix-y symlinked?
468.
by pknopf 9y ago
The FAQ basically says Windows can be supported, but only if the community manages it.
469.
by pknopf 9y ago
Ah, I forgot about the assembly. Is assembly important in microcontrollers?
470.
by pknopf 9y ago
I can see people arguing for object oriented over procedural. As I type that, I realize I've recently learned to love Go, so maybe it is my bias.
471.
by pknopf 9y ago
Let me ask it this way: I'm a higher level programmer. Later in my career I happen to get down to microcontrollers, what would stop me from using C++?
472.
by pknopf 9y ago
Why is C king? Why not C++? The difference is just a compiler, and you can use C in C++.
473.
by pknopf 9y ago
It sounds like you are looking for something like Yocto/OE, which you can bake pretty much any build script into, cross compile and deploy. What exactly are you looking for with regards to deployment, and what tool do use, instead of C
474.
by pknopf 9y ago
Nope. However, it is easy to expose C methods (not entire opencv interface) to your app via PInvoke. I do this often, and allows me to quickly pop in any native library how I want.
475.
by pknopf 9y ago
My company is undergoing huge effort to update our products (embedded devices), even old outdated ones, to comply with GDPR. It has taken up a majority of the last year.
476.
by pknopf 9y ago
It IS a factor. Many people choose Python because of the libraries available. Many developers just want to ride the wave, not innovate.
477.
by pknopf 9y ago
No, not the language itself. But community involvement is important.
478.
by pknopf 9y ago
> being a "React Forms" or whatever that does the same thing, is there? Nothing stopping it, nope. I'm surprised there isn't something currently. That said, it isn't so bad using different render functions for di
479.
by pknopf 9y ago
My sore-point is the lack of community and enthusiasm for it. The available resources and libraries are limited.
480.
by pknopf 9y ago
> if two packages depend on the same library, upgrading only one package might also upgrade the library Yes, you are inheriting the nuances of whatever package manager you choose. Maybe another distro can give you a truly fixed package v

More ›