4 ms·
They did the same accidentally to the co-founder https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360 https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360
by photoGrant 3y ago
They did the same accidentally to the co-founder
https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360 https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360
Once I'd seen that, I doubled down on my self hosted GitLab and never looked back. GitHub can be a mirror for public good, but it's no castle I want to be a prisoner of.
- arcfour 3y agoI love GitLab, but the amount of serious security vulnerabilities (multiple RCEs!) make me quite nervous about the idea of self-hosting it. How do other people deal with this? Are there any competitive alternatives that have a better security record?
- siamese_puff 3y agoI definitely plan on migrating. Absolutely ridiculous
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoWow, I really hate the github's response here. They admitted that it shouldn't have been banned but provided no explanation. Mistakes do happen but being not open about it removes any benefit of doubt and portrays fucking up is normal part of operation for them.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- leros 3y agoThis is how I do it. Everything is in GitLab and I mirror a few repos to GitHub for public consumption and issue tracking.
- binsquare 3y agoThat's astonishingly terrible, has GitHub gone public to address the issue? Can't seem to find GitHub's response in what happened