phenwoods

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by phenwoods 16y ago

   Here you go, http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=climate+change+ze...
2. 2.▲
   by phenwoods 16y ago

   You are kidding, right? You've never heard someone use a term like "alarmist", "warmist" or "true believer" applied to those who accept the evidence for AGW?
3. 3.▲
   by phenwoods 17y ago

   "Completely apart from that, there is no absolute truth. Nietzsche and Wittgenstein destroyed what remained of that possibility." How is the statement "there is no absolute truth", not itself an absolute truth?
4. 4.▲
   by phenwoods 17y ago

   Sorry, I was being sarcastic. But it is one thing to suggest that a scientist's work might be influenced by who's financing the work. It's quite another to suggest, as this article did, that scientists would delibratly concoct a hoax just t
5. 5.▲
   by phenwoods 17y ago

   If only there was some organization on the other side that could afford that sort of money. They'd easily be able to get scientists to produce the results they wanted.
6. 6.▲
   by phenwoods 17y ago

   From the Stackoverflow blog http://blog.stackoverflow.com , this is an official sister site of Stackoverflow. Will this mean that HTML/CSS questions will be migrated from Stackoverflow?