Sorry, I was being sarcastic. But it is one thing to suggest that a scientist's work might be influenced by who's financing the work. It's quite another to sug

Sorry, I was being sarcastic. But it is one thing to suggest that a scientist's work might be influenced by who's financing the work. It's quite another to suggest, as this article did, that scientists would delibratly concoct a hoax just to secure more funding. And if it really were the case that scientists are fabricating scares for a few million pounds, why are thry not also fabricating reasuuring theories to secure funding from those with an interest in maintaining the status quo?