Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pdimitar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
691.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
People will do anything except actually try Elixir. :D ...I mean: pipes, immutability, transparent mega-parallelism... helloooo? I tried F# some years ago (after I was fired from a shop that decided they will go all-in on Java and F# and dr
692.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Quite fascinating. Did you write about your experiences in that area? Would love to read it!
693.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Both are true, separately in different situations. And sometimes both at the same time. There are a lot of useless employees out there. So, so much. And a ton of bullshit jobs as well.
694.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Would love to see a more detailed write-up on this way of using Dagger.
695.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Since we already have excellent tools that follow the UNIX philosophy then I would opt for being a LEGO assembly guy by combining these: - Management of backups themselves: borg / restic (or rustic) / duplicati / duplicacy et
696.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Yeah, this. The data I am most concerned about is not even 1GB after compression. That's all my $HOME configs and all my projects I am working on. Then I have some open datasets I like to fiddle with (mostly *.sql.zst compressed DB dum
697.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Yeah, same. Pointing at some loonie on Twitter who would be flagged out of existence here on HN is not an honest argument in the direction of "look, Rust fans are zealots!". I mean, by that logic, people of my nationality would ha
698.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
No. He should be ashamed because he generalizes, realizes it, admits it and doubles down on it. That's not objective. That's just being stubborn. I can get those kinds of opinions in the local bar. I come to HN for higher-quality
699.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
> By claiming they are hard-working, you are generalizing. It is usually only a couple or few that are actually hard-working people, but then again, I am generalizing because I do not know, I do not wish to actually claim to know. Fair
700.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Well, I don't generalize it and claim it as a truth. That's why I had a heated exchange here. Appreciate the perspective however. It's helpful.
701.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
English is not my mother tongue and while I speak and write it quite well, such nuances escape me. Thanks for the clarification. Appreciate it. <3
702.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
> it does seem like they can have a narrow focus where they solve the challenge they had to solve, but aren't interested going past that point. There's logical reasons for why that happens, but there's unfulfilled potenti
703.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
> or perhaps the impression that clown storage is where it's at for non-corporate. Clown storage. Thanks for the giggle. :D Needed it, had a pretty rough last couple of days.
704.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
I share your disappointment. I explained it for myself with this: nobody cares if we the netizens have our data backed up. The corps want it for themselves and they face zero accountability if they lose it or share it illegally with others.
705.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
:)
706.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
And I didn't say this was about Rust the language. I said many times it's not OK for you to generalize an entire community of hard-working people. It will never be OK. What is actually funny in our exchanges is that I don't e
707.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
I am not upset with anything. That would imply I care what you think. What I dislike, if we can even call it that, is that you misrepresent intentionally and are falling victim to extremely easy to avoid ego trips like claiming that your an
708.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
You can swear on anything, does not make it any more true. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ All you do is defend very anecdotal evidence. Surely you can see this is not logically compelling.
709.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
I see the issue. Biased people like yourself don't belong in tech. For the record, I only picked Rust 5-ish years ago out of a 23 years of career. I know plenty of other languages. I was a skeptic at the start as well. Never generalize
710.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Where do you see emotional reaction? All I do in each reply is point out how you generalize and get surprised that you are being called out. No emotional reactions. Show me where they are?
711.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
- Insult a group with generalization - Members of the group respond non-kindly - "Help! I am being repressed!" I mean, maybe you should try more balanced take next time. Just a thought.
712.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
One lunatic. Not a community full of them. I've been communicating with the "community" for years. Worst I saw was 2-3 people like the one you linked to, and a few more on Rust Users Forum that can be a bit gatekeep-ish at
713.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Very weird. Maybe you can point us at these "every interaction" so we can see for ourselves? Toxic people are everywhere on the net. That's not an interesting insight. If you point us at some lunatic on Twitter who loses thei
714.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
What I find toxic is the claim of zealotry when I can't see any, not on HN anyway. So I called the poster out to show proof. So far there's none, except one Twitter post (because we all know that's the best technical discussi
715.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
I am hopping on Rust threads on HN very regularly and I have to tell you my anecdotal experience. Which is: people complaining about Rust zealots are much more than actual Rust zealots. Thinking of it, I haven't seen a proper Rust zeal
716.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Even 5% on a hot path are quite the big gains, actually. Furthermore, they said that they did not expect any performance gains. They did the rewrite for other reasons and got the unexpected bonus of extra performance.
717.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
> The whole "Lets port everything to Rust" is so misguided. Well, good thing that nobody sane is saying that then.
718.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
> If you need to rely on unsafe in a memory-safe language for performance reasons, then there is a issue with the language compiler at that point, that needs to be fixed. Simple as that. It actually means "Rust needs to interface
719.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
You sound pretty biased, gotta tell you. That snark is not helping any argument you think you might be doing -- and you are not doing any; you are kind of just making fun of Rust, which is pretty boring and uninformative for any reader. Fro
720.
▲
by
pdimitar
2y ago
Where did you even get that weird extreme take from? O_o
More ›