pc86

39 ms·

841.
by pc86 2y ago
Not only that, everything I see is tabs - I don't see music notation anywhere and I'm looking through exercises right now.
842.
by pc86 2y ago
> trade school, while potentially viable for a single person to fix their own situation, is not the answer to the overall problem at a societal level Isn't it? Isn't being realistic about your skills in relation to the rest o
843.
by pc86 2y ago
> > What am I supposed to do? Keep standards high and fail them all? IMO any professor who doesn't fail a student who deserves it should be fired, tenure or no. I had a professor who was in a tenure-track role in our math departm
844.
by pc86 2y ago
What changed in the last 4 years?
845.
by pc86 2y ago
I know that, I'm just saying that if you can "put pressure on the judiciary" (which is a ridiculous statement in most western countries but especially France) to find someone not guilty, you can certainly do it to find them g
846.
by pc86 2y ago
I'm just talking about felons in the US who have served their time in incarceration and finished parole/probation/supervised release being denied multiple rights for the rest of their lives.
847.
by pc86 2y ago
You shouldn't be able to vote if you are actively in prison on the day of the election. Or maybe cases like house arrest. But if we say that you're able to be walking around in society with us, including probation/parole, you
848.
by pc86 2y ago
I don't think anyone is questioning whether it's legal, simply whether it's right or ideologically consistent with people who claim to be pro-democracy.
849.
by pc86 2y ago
If she's a clear cut fascist criminal and everyone on the other side is great then why wouldn't you want her to run? Should be easy to trounce her if she's as bad as you say.
850.
by pc86 2y ago
At the risk of just repeating a previous comment, if you actually want to live in a democracy you have to trust the electorate at some level. I don't know the specifics of this case but if it's clear cut corruption it should be ea
851.
by pc86 2y ago
It's also a way for someone to make their own re-election (or the continued control of their party) easier by "putting pressure on the judiciary branch" as you said to find their opponent guilty. Take the individual parties o
852.
by pc86 2y ago
If your crime is so heinous as to come with life-long punishment, you should be in prison for life. If the idea of putting someone in prison for life for a particular crime makes you take pause, perhaps they shouldn't have any life-l
853.
by pc86 2y ago
> Also, it didn't fall into the ground, but into the water. Ah yes very important distinction this
854.
by pc86 2y ago
IMO hybrid only works when there is a set day to be in the office for everyone. Otherwise you are just going into the office to have zoom/teams meetings with the remote people, and you end up with one of two things: 1. Everyone taking
855.
by pc86 2y ago
Exactly the type of comment I'd expect to see on an HN discussion about different types of dashes.
856.
by pc86 2y ago
There is definitely a trend, and not a new one, to assume that all managers, directors, etc. are just bumbling fools who nepotised their way into bags of cash every two weeks and provide no actual value. I'm sure there are examples whe
857.
by pc86 2y ago
The article asserts it, yes, with not a single quantitative study actually supporting that. They have some tangentially related evidence around real estate and survey responses, and they assert - again, without direct evidence - that these
858.
by pc86 2y ago
I think you might be on to something with the empathy but I don't think it's as naive as "I don't work well at home so these other people can't work well from home." I think it's much more likely somethi
859.
by pc86 2y ago
Not to mention that this means 2/3 of people prefer to be in the office at least some of the time and 2/3 of people prefer to work at home at least some of the time . So naturally if you're strictly going based off of numb
860.
by pc86 2y ago
We're not talking about people who are here illegally, we're talking about people who have already proven they are incapable or unwilling to operate a motor vehicle safely, get punished for it, and decide to drive anyway.
861.
by pc86 2y ago
False equivalency. Even taken to extreme ends nothing here can be construed as suggesting "only the wealthy" should be allowed or able to drive. The moment someone suggests enforcement of a law someone comes running in yelling abo
862.
by pc86 2y ago
> We didn’t endure that gauntlet so that healthcare could be as available as tap water. "I worked really hard so it doesn't matter if people die for want of care if it means I will make $450k/yr instead of $500k/yr.&q
863.
by pc86 2y ago
Yes, people will break the law. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be punished for it, and it doesn't mean that we shouldn't do things that are good for society (telling bad drivers they're no longer allowed to drive)
864.
by pc86 2y ago
There is no reason the federal government needs to pay resident salaries. There is no reason residents need to make $50k/yr in NYC. There is no reason medical school needs to cost $400,000 for someone to make $200k/yr as a family
865.
by pc86 2y ago
The only time I've seen people care is if you lay out an identical order and show the percentage increase over ordering delivery through the restaurant, or picking it up yourself. DoorDash adds upwards of a couple dollars to every item
866.
by pc86 2y ago
Driving is not a right, it is a privilege. Someone's individual economic circumstances are irrelevant. You can either drive safely or you can't.
867.
by pc86 2y ago
You don't have a right to free transportation. I'd immediately donate money to and vote for any politician stupid enough to say we should revoke licenses from the worst 1% of drivers. Revoke their licenses, let them figure it out.
868.
by pc86 2y ago
> 4 actual crashes in less than 20K miles Sorry if you're having a car crash every 6 months or less, you shouldn't have a license. Driving a car is privilege granted to you by your state, and this state is negligent in its prot
869.
by pc86 2y ago
DoorDash is just a means to extract revenue from users, contractors, and restaurants and give it to the owners of DoorDash. It's not a sustainable business and I'm not convinced it was ever intended to be. COVID was a fluke that m
870.
by pc86 2y ago
Users get rate limited because their account is new, or as you alluded to, they're not productively adding to the conversation (as evidenced by vote ratio at least). It seems like the system working as designed, to be honest.

More ›