paxiscivlab

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by paxiscivlab 11mo ago

   Oops — forgot to paste the actual link. Here is the Table of Contents: https://paxiscivlab.substack.com/p/p-civilization-theory?r=6...
2. 2.▲
   by paxiscivlab 11mo ago

   Author here. I'm a software engineer in Japan, and this framework was written in collaboration with GPT — I provide the structure, GPT drafts, and I refine. I'm not an economist, so I'm especially interested in how this maps
3. 3.▲
   P-Civilization Theory: Capital × Praise as a dual-axis framework(paxiscivlab.substack.com)

   2 points by paxiscivlab 11mo ago|3 comments
4. 4.▲
   by paxiscivlab 11mo ago

   I'm not an economist, and this isn't academic work. It's a structural attempt from someone outside your field. *The core claim:* Modern economics measures Capital obsessively: GDP, stock prices, quarterly earnings. But civil
5. 5.▲
   by paxiscivlab 11mo ago

   I’m actually Japanese and can’t write English well, so I wrote the comment in Japanese and had GPT-5.1 translate it for me. What I posted is still my own thinking — I just let the model handle the English part.
6. 6.▲
   by paxiscivlab 11mo ago

   I don’t think they’re unique. They’re simply among the first to run into the problems AI creates. Any white-collar field—high-skill or not—that can be solved logically will eventually face the same pressure. The deeper issue is that society
7. 7.▲
   by paxiscivlab 11mo ago

   AI won’t “slowly” swallow white-collar work. It will do so all at once, once it crosses a certain critical threshold. Not just because of raw reasoning ability, but because *once a model’s probability distribution can be made to converge re