2 ms·
I'm not an economist, and this isn't academic work. It's a structural attempt from someone outside your field. *The core claim:* Modern economics measures Cap
by paxiscivlab 11mo ago
I'm not an economist, and this isn't academic work.
It's a structural attempt from someone outside your field.
*The core claim:*
Modern economics measures Capital obsessively: GDP, stock prices,
quarterly earnings.
But civilization depends just as much on contributions that markets
can't capture:
- Infrastructure maintenance
- Care work and child-rearing
- Education and basic research
- Community cohesion
I call this second axis *Praise* — long-term trust credit.
*The proposal:*
P-Bonds: financial instruments that channel surplus capital to
social pain points and pay "interest" in Praise (measured in "bips"),
not currency.
Examples:
- Coastal flood protection (investment-type P-Bond)
- Rural digital connectivity (recruitment-type P-Bond)
- Nationwide basic income (donation-type P-Bond)
*The method:*
I wrote this with GPT as my co-author. I define the conceptual constraints,
GPT drafts, I refine. 23,000 words across 4 chapters.
*What I want to know:*
Which existing theories does this resemble, extend, or contradict?
- Piketty's r > g?
- Ostrom's commons?
- Social capital frameworks?
- Something else entirely?
I'm prepared to be wrong — but I want to understand where this sits
in the existing landscape.
Table of Contents: [URL]
- paxiscivlab 11mo agoOops — forgot to paste the actual link. Here is the Table of Contents: https://paxiscivlab.substack.com/p/p-civilization-theory?r=6xljxt https://paxiscivlab.substack.com/p/p-civilization-theory?r=6...