paxcoder

22 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   As I understand, the blastocyst is a state of a human being in the early stage of its development, having in turn developed from the morula, and the zygote (the first cell). If you want to argue semantics of the words or the phrase, we can
2. 182.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   What I referred to is the death of a human early in its development (blastocyst) resulting from the steps necessary to derive embryonic stem cells (as opposed to those necessary for adult stem cell derivation like here and elsewhere)
3. 183.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   Please specify which ones and exactly how.
4. 184.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   Well, it looks like we can advance science without pretending killing human beings is ok, after all.
5. 185.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   Undefined behavior has a purpose: Not specifying implementation details makes it easier to write new implementations and for a wider variety of platforms. "De facto standards" take away this freedom, so ideally you'd want to
6. 186.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   It's crowdsourcing, and for-profit crowdsourcing is pretty much exploitative by definition.
7. 187.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   To write portable code, I wouldn't study de-facto definitions of de-jure undefined behavior, except to see if I could cover every possible one and only if all alternatives were inferior.
8. 188.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   non-embryonic
9. 189.▲
   by paxcoder 10y ago

   Ignore, pretend, you'll still be wrong. I'll call it like I see it.
10. 190.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    Copyleft is those user-protecting restrictions. I'll refrain from repeating myself. By your "fewer restrictions" logic, permissive licenses would be the ones most copyleft. Again, the purpose of copyleft is proliferating &q
11. 191.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    It is incomplete: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/search?ut...
12. 192.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    People have taken their time to draw you a picture of a solution you could have come up with yourself. They are not talking about opt-in security, you are the only one. GPLv3 does not hinder security. You are furthering FUD.
13. 193.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    I explicitly said a superior copyleft license. That is, I stated the value I presuppose, and in this context GPLv3's superiority to GPLv3 is clear. What's "extreme" is denying users control of their own devices, not the
14. 194.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    Let me guess: It's not a complete standard library?
15. 195.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    I want to react to the signature FUD: GPLv3 is clearly a superior copyleft license to GPLv2 despite Linus' latently permissive opinion on the anti-TiVoization clause.
16. 196.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    I (and I'm sure others) would appreciate references to the minimal set of things necessary to absorb to easily participate in the PLT discussion. This is the opposite of that.
17. 197.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    Revolting. I protest against suicide, the "assistance", the approval, and the very idea that it could somehow be eu (good).
18. 198.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    Where does is the money coming from? I'd like to know what business model the company you work for employs.
19. 199.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    It might be considered poor form not to spell the problem out, however I honestly think it is crystal clear But what's interesting is that I was being upvoted until I've rephrased the comment. It used to be "That's an un
20. 200.▲
    by paxcoder 10y ago

    I know what you're referring to, but then again, that's a matter of formatting, not encoding.
21. 201.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    That comparison makes no sense.
22. 202.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    Any recommendations? Maybe start a flowchart for collaborative editing? Please link me.
23. 203.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    Tell me this Sterling guy got most other things wrong to even out being this spot on way back in 1994.
24. 204.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    This won't solve the problem of having to learn three different technologies, but whatever might mitigate the pain that we call JavaScript (quirks) is welcome. People who specialize in webdev learn things by heart so perhaps they forge
25. 205.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    Cam you recommend some easy* literature to understand the things you're referring to? I'm interested in particular in things more flexible and easier to understand than the monad. *as in not written by and for mathematicians
26. 206.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    Recommend an essay that enumerates the techniques? Or if you don't know of any, ping me when you write a blog post? :) Thanks in advance.
27. 207.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    I meant shouldn't be the norm. Screw these uneditable, permanent forums.
28. 208.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    So you bet your time. It's how I got my job too, but that should be the norm (unless there are guarantees). Companies should cover the expenses of finding employees, instead of crowdsourcing the unemployed.
29. 209.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    That's a different point. What you were doing was defending the personality flaw. Going "OT" was due to the title. I thought it was that post where Torvalds obstinately defends his rudeness. Basically the man's lack of s
30. 210.▲
    by paxcoder 11y ago

    I'll be curteous and elaborate: The double standard is allowing Torvalds to bash, but disallowing "bashing" his bashing. I refrained from guessing the cause of this before, but I believe it is you being a fan of Torvalds&#x27