Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
paulcole
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
721.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
How so? The whole discussion stems from someone saying that they should be paid relative (in proportion to) their value. All I want to know is what proportion (i.e. a percentage between 0 and 100) someone would deem fair. Why is that so har
722.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> And the employer wants to pay the employee as little as possible for as much productivity as possible. Yes, this is literally what I replied to in the first place. Both sides want to get the most for the least. It doesn’t matter how ti
723.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Would you say the same thing about a book?
724.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
So as a worker, what specific proportion do you believe is fair to dictate?
725.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
But you can for sure tell me the proportion that you think is fair right? Should it be 25%, 50%, 99%?
726.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
What specific linear correlation do you think is fair? And how do you calculate the value you provide?
727.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
X and Y exist right? Why can’t you divide them to make a proportion?
728.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
I can assure you it is. You get paid X. You deliver Y value. The proportion is X / Y. Sometimes that proportion is very high, sometimes it is very low. Sometimes it is negative. Sometimes you get a divide by zero error. And again, the
729.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Yes, but right now I’m asking the person who said they wanted a proportional amount of value. Either they can/will answer the question or they can’t/won’t.
730.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
It’s always proportional to the value you provide. You just don’t like the proportion lol. What specific proportion do you think is fair? And how do you calculate the value you provide?
731.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> They want to get as much productivity out of you for as little pay as possible It’s only adversarial because you want to get as much pay as possible out of them for as little productivity as possible. > I somewhat agreed and got cau
732.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> I can explain it pretty well. You don’t need to. The WHO has already done so: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupat... The problem is that everybody just makes up their own definition.
733.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
1. It is a liability thing and it’s just safer to not give feedback. 2. If I don’t want to hire you, it’s very likely that I have 0 interest in wanting to interact with you further. You don’t have a job and you want a job where I work. When
734.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> I am already not comfortable with Apple picking winners This is what I like most about them! Just pick something that you think is good. If I like what you pick I'll keep buying from you.
735.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
“Buzzword A is the new Buzzword B” is the new “Buzzword B is Broken”
736.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Schools also used to teach sarcasm detection.
737.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> Sure most of their companies didn't make much profit or, in many cases, even revenue - but the magic was palpable. These businesses are called hobbies.
738.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
I’m not sure if you’re telling me that I’m right or that I’m wrong.
739.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
I think it’s in the 0-2% over the next 100 years range. I think there are situations where the US collapses but the world doesn’t so that’s why it’s lower. If the world collapse happens, it’ll be a result of pandemic, meteor, solar storm, n
740.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> Beyond financial services Beyond the hoses and water what do we need the fire trucks for?
741.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
I am impressed that you are so well versed in history. What % chance do you think there is that the US collapses in over the next 10, 25, 50, and 100 years?
742.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
> I wonder if the market is strong enough for this It is not. You could not pay the average person to run a local LLM instead of just relying on Siri/Alexa/Google Assistant/whatever is built into the apps and hardware they
743.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
I think 5 in 100 is totally reasonable to wave off. I’m not giving it a second thought personally. If it happens it will be so bad that I’ll almost certainly die as a result (due to chronic illness) so I should just keep on living as-is and
744.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
The entire world has too much riding on the US not collapsing. I think it’s a 5% chance over the next 100 years.
745.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Aren’t they creating a market of 1?
746.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
How many healthcare providers do you know personally who have faced severe penalties for leaking information? The reality is that for a small doctor/dental/whatever office, there is essentially 0 risk. HIPAA violations that carry
747.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Aren’t they just creating a market of 1?
748.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Misleading clickbait title on this post. Doesn’t match the clickbait title on the article itself.
749.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
I dont even bother. I never end up looking back at anything and futzing with different programs and file formats and workflows isn’t a hobby of mine. Easy come easy go.
750.
▲
by
paulcole
2y ago
Metafilter.com
More ›