outer_web

8 ms·

121.
by outer_web 2y ago
I believe the term is "to John McAfee".
122.
by outer_web 2y ago
> Neighbors say the agents announced "FBI, come out!" over a megaphone. A woman came out of the house holding a phone. Then they are really selling the ruse that they don't know where he is.
123.
by outer_web 2y ago
Seems like it'd be difficult or legally troublesome to fire someone (in his role) who has been afk for a couple of weeks.
124.
by outer_web 2y ago
Hah well .gov timeouts are a growing hallmark of this administration. Maybe I have a skewed vision of science because I work in industry but I picture it as efficient, individual work that is thrust (published) into a vast bureaucracy (peer
125.
by outer_web 2y ago
> to ensure alignment with the Administration’s priorities. "We no longer are doing the fidelity pledge in alignment with this officiant's priorities. This phrase may sound familiar, we used it to remove diversity goals from ch
126.
by outer_web 2y ago
That's the most thorough, well-written, and not overly dry history of the acquisition saga.
127.
by outer_web 2y ago
Smart (evil) way to hustle people off Windows 10.
128.
by outer_web 2y ago
Did Elon buy the Xe name from them or something?
129.
by outer_web 2y ago
'X' is cumbersome. Everybody knows what you're talking about when you say Twitter.
130.
by outer_web 2y ago
The ad widget should have sent a camera perm request to your browser.
131.
by outer_web 2y ago
Are you running into those autogen crawler labyrinths that have been posted about recently? Certainly the .edu and .gov ones are probably just huge sites. Am I correct in assuming you are recrawling your entire corpus to get fresh results?
132.
by outer_web 2y ago
I mean it could also be to make people fear being watched/rolled up at any moment.
133.
by outer_web 2y ago
Of course not. There are plenty of circumstances that would change the order. But that'd be my 'all things being equal' ranking. I had hoped it was implied that I'd prefer to rent a non-haunted condo over owning a haunte
134.
by outer_web 2y ago
"This concrete, unambiguous example contradicts my worldview so I am going to report it."
135.
by outer_web 2y ago
Speak for yourself. For me, buying is better than any rental options and a freestanding building is better than anything attached or in an HOA.
136.
by outer_web 2y ago
Yup. Or it is bought by Friends LLC.
137.
by outer_web 2y ago
Is insatiable demand equivalent to 'broken' housing? Seems like the latter is a pejorative and the former is the better of two possible problems. Considering people live in apartments and condos, what's the problem with an AD
138.
by outer_web 2y ago
Exactly, rather than sending people farther and farther out of county, it lets LA's existing, sprawling suburbs look a tiny bit more like a real city.
139.
by outer_web 2y ago
[flagged]
140.
by outer_web 2y ago
Who doesn't enjoy a good equilibrium?
141.
by outer_web 2y ago
I think for many the only alternative is renting. Having your rent go towards ownership is preferable in many cases.
142.
by outer_web 2y ago
I thought the post says one person buys the lot and then sells it to friends who individually fund the houses.
143.
by outer_web 2y ago
Yeah man, you sound like a 14-year old edgelord who just learned about the Bay of Pigs. How many contemporary security professionals would call them 'competent' versus 'incompetent'?
144.
by outer_web 2y ago
Sorry are you claiming that the United States intelligence community is incompetent and that anyone who things otherwise is poorly educated? What are you basing this on?
145.
by outer_web 2y ago
"Your comms are tapped by records laws." "Good enough for me!"
146.
by outer_web 2y ago
EDIT: by "there's no distinction between them" I was simply saying the two-party system is bad, not that there is no distinction between them. And anyone who disagrees must be partisan.
147.
by outer_web 2y ago
I don't think you deserve the downvotes considering that would be very in character for this administration. That said, it does not seem plausible considering the number of officials they'd have to incriminate to burn Goldberg, no
148.
by outer_web 2y ago
Lol the most liar-y way to phrase it.
149.
by outer_web 2y ago
I appreciate the clarification. I hope you'll understand the confusion created by offering a fact that does not apply to the current discussion.
150.
by outer_web 2y ago
Just to clarify > Is this the same Jeff Goldberg who lied us into the Iraq War? Does not mean "we should doubt this article" but actually means > I think everyone involved in the Iraq mess should have been civically un-perso

More ›