outer_web

7 ms·

151.
by outer_web 2y ago
And yet here you are saying we shouldn't listen to a story about people being bombed based on political calculus.
152.
by outer_web 2y ago
Are you saying he only took meaningless stuff? Lol.
153.
by outer_web 2y ago
Film and tv are safe, this was done by political appointees. The civil servants (you know, the "deep state") are much better about it because it's their job.
154.
by outer_web 2y ago
I could have swore that was Dick Cheney.
155.
by outer_web 2y ago
Nothing has changed in twenty years. Texans still hate California, businesses still exploit people for profit.
156.
by outer_web 2y ago
Lol their bankruptcy was. Read up on it or watch the documentary.
157.
by outer_web 2y ago
I don't think that's what he was saying.
158.
by outer_web 2y ago
How does one properly align the incentives of people and corporations?
159.
by outer_web 2y ago
Yeah he even has a section about deregulation problems in Texas and California... then talks only about wildfires in 2020. Deregulating an industry to achieve a specific goal is certainly one approach.
160.
by outer_web 2y ago
I mean half of us have recklessly give out dna at one time or another.
161.
by outer_web 2y ago
> I see a lot of your posts in this thread arguing how things will be okay and we aren't in a constitutional crisis yet but that doesn't seem to be a great response to the point that it looks like Trump is driving imminently to
162.
by outer_web 2y ago
I'd love to have a discussion with you about it but you seem convinced I have an agenda.
163.
by outer_web 2y ago
I feel like we as a country screwed up the prioritization of a child's right to life vs a parent's right to extend their religion to their child. I know, I know but where do we draw the line???
164.
by outer_web 2y ago
Desktop or mobile? Just HN or others? I recall having this issue on a variety of sites a few months back. Their help pages had people experiencing the same issues but no solutions. I think I downloaded FF Nightly and it wasn't an issue
165.
by outer_web 2y ago
A few things but your concern is totally valid; we are in a bad place if he does not back down. 1. Executive power has limits. E.g. civil litigation and state law are largely outside his jurisdiction. 2. Agents of the government must follow
166.
by outer_web 2y ago
Because power and legal liability are different. He can order a political opponent thrown in prison without cause. He does not have the power to do so, so that person would be freed by a court. Due to the immunity ruling, he is not liable f
167.
by outer_web 2y ago
Yes, immunity means there are zero downsides for him to try illegal things. That doesn't legalize illegal orders, it just means they all have to wait for their day in court.
168.
by outer_web 2y ago
Same https://archive.is/9oqmi
169.
by outer_web 2y ago
Let's cross that bridge if we come to it. Trump is as good at backing down as he is at making asinine claims.
170.
by outer_web 2y ago
Eh, SCOTUS still has a big opportunity to reign in the power he claims. The district courts are already doing their thing. Arbitrarily searching and refusing foreign nationals at the border was always an executive power and we have temporar
171.
by outer_web 2y ago
Tay Tweets remembers.
172.
by outer_web 2y ago
I would totally watch Turkish Billy Madison.
173.
by outer_web 2y ago
Exactly my point, "hallucinate evidence" makes it seem like it'd be used as, well, evidence.
174.
by outer_web 2y ago
Absolutely, it is impossible to draw a line based on, say how evil the person is or how much they are trying to spread the evil. Because anyone can be evil, we simply cannot take action against anyone!
175.
by outer_web 2y ago
We need a new word then, for hijacking planes and driving explosives-laden boats into tankers. Any ideas?
176.
by outer_web 2y ago
Given how LLM generated stuff has gone over with courts thus far, I can't see one accepting an AI summary as evidence. They're describing basically using AI as grep -r, which seems reasonable with the assumption that they are foll
177.
by outer_web 2y ago
"I saw you listening to Kanye in 2005 and now you don't like him, what a hypocrite!"
178.
by outer_web 2y ago
This probably doesn't fit the two-team paradigm. When you consider the objectives might be something different from ensuring democrats win offices in two years, the rationale may make more sense.
179.
by outer_web 2y ago
Of all the things to be outraged about you choose two astronauts spending more time in space out an abundance of caution for the safety of their return flight? Empathy, sure. Outrage? Lol.
180.
by outer_web 2y ago
A three-hour tour.

More ›