orangedog

3 ms·

1.
by orangedog 9d ago
Yeah, when you are pulling out terms of the very online like "meat proxies", you're not exactly in a place to judge the rest of society, you're in a bubble.
2.
by orangedog 9d ago
I don't know if it is the minority but I think sanity is the group of people not taking a "side" and just realizing this new tech is what it is and it's going to and has had both major advantages and disadvantages. Blog
3.
by orangedog 9d ago
Defamation? The author's responses and complete lack of honesty certainly made it look like a scam. The author listed feature after feature that were unfulfilled. Scam is being fairly kind to the project, I thought the guy was the wors
4.
by orangedog 10d ago
It comes across as spiteful, I don't think it is at all obvious and it isn't obvious to the store owner either. We just disagree, and that's why this is the wrong approach to enacting whatever kind of change they wanted.
5.
by orangedog 10d ago
They can do that but it would be a huge overreach. I guess you have strong feelings about it, but plenty of us don't want it banned.
6.
by orangedog 10d ago
That's not what the "threat" said. It said that they would give them a list of people, it isn't obvious that hiring some random would have made them happy. It's not even obvious whether this wasn't just a conve
7.
by orangedog 10d ago
It seems like a ban would both be overreaching and won't happen. If your personal preference is to not engage with it, then don't.
8.
by orangedog 10d ago
It was just a replacement for those temporary chalkboard menus, the person wo did that previously left. Perhaps she has bad taste but that doesn't mean she was slacking off. Did they spend a lot of time on the chalkboard menus previous
9.
by orangedog 10d ago
In the context of how it was done, saying that they would give them a list of people and a day to think it over, it really is a threat, it's a kind of extortion.
10.
by orangedog 10d ago
It only signals to me that they have other priorities.
11.
by orangedog 10d ago
I mean there's a pretty big third group there which recognizes the good parts and the bad parts. Right? For every person who can spot it a mile away I wonder how many false positives they have or simply aren't aware of it. If you&
12.
by orangedog 10d ago
Some people get value out of finding results not the actual work. It is still work, just different kind of work.
13.
by orangedog 10d ago
I don't get why it is hard to understand there is middle ground. People are 10x their productivity, it isn't all buggy junk, but it isn't all it is hyped up to be either. It isn't that complicated. If you hold the extrem
14.
by orangedog 12d ago
Just an fyi since my poli sci prof would bring this up whenever it was mentioned: Trump cannot unilaterally cancel elections. They are run by the states. Is there much of substance to this article? It mostly seems doomerism and conjecture.
15.
by orangedog 12d ago
You've identified a very specific type of web dev, one that works on perf critical apps in a corp environment and said corp cares about perf and quality. Tons of people simply don't work in those environments and unfortunately thi
16.
by orangedog 12d ago
I don't get why you're being so rude. What's the point? For the record, I hardly use these models. I've simply seen that they can replace existing web apps. That hurts the market for web devs, most orgs aren't build
17.
by orangedog 12d ago
That only matters if you need to support 1k users. Tons of software doesn't and if you can spit out a web app in a few hours a lot of companies are going to do that. I'm sure there is still a pot for really high quality stuff but
18.
by orangedog 12d ago
The huge apps that my coworkers build out with minimal human input makes me scared to be a web dev in this environment. Just way too much can get automated.
19.
by orangedog 12d ago
I don't see it as any different as dev without it, though I don't find that especially "fun" either. You're just staring at a screen pushing pixels all day. Whether I do that with Claude or without doesn't matt
20.
by orangedog 12d ago
The us is not anti-immigrant, it accepts massive numbers of immigrants every year. It would be below sustainable birthrate without it.
21.
by orangedog 12d ago
How do people get by when that happens? If you have no job after a period of time, what are your options?
22.
by orangedog 12d ago
Does Canada not already have an issue with not enough jobs available?
23.
by orangedog 12d ago
Is it possible to jump into this with a background as a senior dev or is it too late? I don't know where to get started, would you just look like a junior or entry level candidate by doing that?
24.
by orangedog 29d ago
Thank you for providing sources.
25.
by orangedog 29d ago
Do you have anything which shows long-term effects are 50-70%?
26.
by orangedog 29d ago
I have stopped taking it, I didn't have side effects.
27.
by orangedog 29d ago
> The most common side effects reported by patients in the study by Hu et al1 of 401 outpatients taking SSRIs were drowsiness (38%), dry mouth (34%), and sexual dysfunction (34%) > which was conducted in 1999-2000, questioned patients
28.
by orangedog 29d ago
Sure. I always find the more extremist responses (you can find some towards the bottom) confusing because the only side effect I've ever been aware of is not wanting to die. I just think there's a lot of fud around this and I have
29.
by orangedog 29d ago
> In both research and clinical contexts, an important challenge is presented by the phenomenological overlap between side effects and residual symptoms of depression. Thus, fatigue, cognitive impairment, apathy, jitteriness and irritabi
30.
by orangedog 29d ago
This topic always draws out the contrarians. It's like vaccine discussion.

More ›