oneplane

6 ms·

61.
by oneplane 2y ago
Yes, Google only made it available for Google Messages. They don't have an SDK or API you can use to make your own clients or servers. Google also didn't put it up for standards with the GSMA or any other standards body, at least
62.
by oneplane 2y ago
There is no silicon for useful laptops that isn't US-controlled or China-controlled. On top of that, there is no ISA or reference CPU that isn't US-based. In the future, we might have RISC-V, but right now, we don't. You can
63.
by oneplane 2y ago
So essentially, it's not really an Apple thing, it's more that the universal RCS profile just didn't have encryption, and Google RCS was a non-standard extension that nobody else was allowed to use. The real news is the updat
64.
by oneplane 2y ago
That secondary markets thing has been an earlier subject (but not really covering app stores etc at that time), there were issues where larger companies didn't want you selling CD Keys or Windows license keys you weren't using, an
65.
by oneplane 2y ago
I wonder if (especially after finishing the bottom part of the article) a mailing list type of interaction, but with Git, is exactly the sort of "in the open" version that is described as a potential improvement. I'm not sure
66.
by oneplane 2y ago
Isn't this the same thing as no-code, low-code, MS Access, Excel, HyperCard, 4GL, COBOL etc. we've already had? The idea being that you can build something without knowing how to build something (on a gradient -- you could argue t
67.
by oneplane 2y ago
If you read the article, and then read the referenced report, you can see that long term planning is included, which also covers maintenance and upgrades. None of those are new issues or unsolved problems. It's not core to the issue of
68.
by oneplane 2y ago
I'm surprised containers aren't mentioned once. With mass virtual hosting (not virtualisation, think in terms of vhosts in Apache) resource sharing and security issues that aren't easily fixed with some UID/GID quota tri
69.
by oneplane 2y ago
Right, but that's something any audit will poke right through, and if you take the paper trail (or follow the money) far enough, it just ends up with whatever tax haven corp that is used for the money either way, and the profits and lo
70.
by oneplane 2y ago
They could charge themselves, but what would a couple of entries in bookkeeping do here. If you 'charge yourself' there is no cost, and no gain. It's meaningless.
71.
by oneplane 2y ago
You can either not be hoarding, or you can be richest man in the world. You can't have it both ways.
72.
by oneplane 2y ago
I suppose that's possible. Oddly enough, we haven't seen pabs3 take part in their own submission.
73.
by oneplane 2y ago
That's why I wrote "Asahi Linux targeted". The results cannot be linked here as the contents would violate the guidelines.
74.
by oneplane 2y ago
It doesn't. It has shown this banner for years, for anyone with a HackerNews referrer. As for the flagging, the guidelines say otherwise. A change in leadership and governance of a prominent open source project is noteworthy to the poi
75.
by oneplane 2y ago
I think it's reasonable to ask, but unreasonable and unrealistic to expect someone to come tell their story just for you. Even if you (and others) have never seen this before. What you could do is plug "Asahi Linux targeted"
76.
by oneplane 2y ago
That's because they have been hurt by HN. Not intentionally by HN itself, but they are also not the only target. As for how you haven't heard of them before, that is a bit surprising. They have been mentioned here plenty of times.
77.
by oneplane 2y ago
To me it seems to perfectly outline HN's reputation when moderation is delayed. This brigading has been happening on multiple projects for years, specifically by the actors mentioned in the link, but plenty of others as well. If anythi
78.
by oneplane 2y ago
That is one possibility. It could also be exactly why this warning is on the page to begin with.
79.
by oneplane 2y ago
Because HN has a reputation and this influences that reputation. The same way an open relay would harm your MTA reputation or an open redirect harms your domain reputation. So if HN were to think: "gee, we don't want to delete thi
80.
by oneplane 2y ago
I don't think that's the clue here. The clue is calling out such behaviour. Maybe that's already something that people do, and the banner does nothing. Or maybe it's not something people do, and maybe some people start d
81.
by oneplane 2y ago
The article doesn't, but it provides the context on why the warning does, which is why it is there. That should answer your question: "What’s with the warning on the top?" Perhaps you expected a list of all sorts of interacti
82.
by oneplane 2y ago
Reading a biography mostly informed me about the lack of general empathy, remorse, sympathy. Only regret came forward a little (and only once). > be crazy enough to bet it all Anyone who doesn't suffer any real consequences. Having
83.
by oneplane 2y ago
Do you have any examples where that is the case, rather than obvious rule breaking? I have seen some "voted down because people don't like it" but not "hidden because people don't like it". Voting does not equa
84.
by oneplane 2y ago
I think the contents of the warning explain the warning on the top adequately. There are some links in there as well, and they in turn lead to examples and citations. Considering the amount of visitors on HN, it's possible you've
85.
by oneplane 2y ago
Sure it does, wealth hoarding is a significant factor in students enrolling in doctoral degrees. Be it because it is a step towards more wealth, or because it's not (and as such a group that might be a good fit, but prefer more wealth
86.
by oneplane 2y ago
You'd think someone would notice how this process is suboptimal and either come up with a way to make the process better, or at least a way to have a single point of contact with knowledge and experience (and reputation) to deal with t
87.
by oneplane 2y ago
I wonder how that would work out. It's a bit of an inverse-Ouroboros where the people that are the government keep saying they are 'doing something about the government' without realising that that's them. Maybe they see
88.
by oneplane 2y ago
We're talking about mindshare, not commercial incentives. There are plenty of things sold to small groups of buyers with no significant mindshare. Mindshare does not equal commercial viability or sales numbers. As for who would pay for
89.
by oneplane 2y ago
Ada has practically no mindshare, Rust does. Just like say, Scala, things can be technically 'good', but without adoption it isn't going to get the attention and visibility to compete with everything that does.
90.
by oneplane 2y ago
It's not only people that is hard, it's network effects that are very significant here. The article also describes all sorts of truths in isolation, but the processes where these things happen do not exist in isolation. If all peo

More ›