Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oneiftwo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
I've always assumed array iteration is more expensive you don't know the size of the objects and/or they aren't contiguous.
2.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
Never in my life have I found these totally generic advice collations useful. They're always vague, unfalsifiable, borderline platitudes. They "work" for the same reasons horoscopes work, and I think a sizable minority, if no
3.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
Here is the first study[0] which correctly looked at the combination of HCQ with zinc sulfate ionophore, as per the original theory, which originated from a Dutch researcher who predicted the mechanism by which HCQ was shown to be in vitro
4.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>that all matter has some associated mind or consciousness, and vice versa. Where there is mind there is matter and where there is matter there is mind. That doesn't make sense. We know that humans (and probably most if not all cons
5.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
This is a fantastic resource. I've long lamented the difficulty of finding textbooks. Since colleges buy them back every semester to control demand, it's actually hard to find something that should be cheap and common. It's t
6.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>There are no shades of gray here. We're weighing human extinction against an economic system here. These things are not comparable. The whole point of an economy is to facilitate human existence. Again, you don't seem to have
7.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>And idiots will continue parroting this exact line as billions of people are dying. Exactly the same way idiots are protesting social distancing, lockdowns, and mask wearing in US right now There is no purpose to have a discussion when
8.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>The big difference here is that the risk of climate scientists being right is that billions of people die. That's literally an absolute worst case prediction. You cannot guide policy exclusively with worst case predictions. >We&
9.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>Being a geoscintist does not make you a climatologist. It's amazing to me that people who are experts in one domain think that gives them the authority to talk about other domains. I literally consume the same data. It's a sis
10.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>Do critics of government hold other prediction "markets" to the same standards? You realize that modern economics is basically divination for the same reason that climate science is uncertain? Structurally the two sciences are
11.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
I'll buck the apologist trend here and mention that artists by and large are not technical people and are only concerned with the superficial pleasant appearance of pixel art, and not a faithful reproduction even assuming they were cap
12.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>Vietnam currently has no deaths from covid-19 precisely because scientists were in charge Vietnam was prepared because they, like Taiwan, knew from the start that China was lying and took proactive steps that western countries failed to
13.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
How anyone can continue to place so much faith into dogmatic science, after the global and nearly universal failure of these same institutions to properly prepare for and handle covid, is beyond me. This post is pure fear porn. Environmenta
14.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
Google is regularly accused of leaning left and has taken open steps to curate search results and other content in an ostensibly unbiased manner, but one which may disproportionately censor right leaning sources. This is motive for a right
15.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>Getting a stupid ribbon in third grade is not going to radically inform your approach to life. It's not a single stupid ribbon. It's growing up in a society where literally every competition results in everyone winning. Predic
16.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
> which is the general level of mediocrity, even at the top levels of academia This is not unique to academia. Our entire society has gradually degenerated over the last few decades for a number of constructively interfering reasons: 1.
17.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
Everything remotely related to adware is just gross. It's hard to believe that after 10 years of this nothing has changed and the tricks are as dirty as ever. Totally unethical industry and I can't wait for the bubble to collapse.
18.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
>it’s essential that mainstream journalistic institutions reaffirm their bona fides as disinterested purveyors of fact and honest brokers of controversy This hasn't been true for decades. Almost all modern mainstream journalism is a
19.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
It's tragic to see how Music TeleVision was destroyed by vapid commercialization. A cultural icon was forced to blandify all of its content to appeal to the most common denominator and switch completely to totally unrelated genres in p
20.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
There was a comprehensive literature review posted on /r/coronavirus some two months ago that strong (and statistically robust in my opinion as a professional data scientist) indicating that smokers were less likely to be infected
21.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
What special knowledge do you think you need to interpret 5 months of COVID studies? That's almost two semesters of grad school. You don't need a PhD to gain enough knowledge of covid from literature to speculate meaningfully on a
22.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
I absolutely agree with this sentiment. It's why I had difficulty reading "how to win friends and influence people" despite how frequently and casually lauded it is. It's literally an instruction manual for using indirec
23.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
> My best guess is that in the United States especially, it's a combination economic/socitial factors and vitamin D deficiency that's making the virus have higher mortality in populations of racial minorities with darker s
24.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
I expect we will see gradual conversion of roads to be more amenable to autonomous driving - barriers for pedestrians, special markings, etc - and autonomous zones will become more and more commonplace. On the other hand I think with the co
25.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
This is similar to the price of water. Yes water is essential but it is readily available and so the price is low. Same for many essential jobs. Turns out a lot of the work necessary to keep civilization ticking is menial and requires no sp
26.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
Have you ever actually had to hire someone to do something nontrivial? Statistically speaking, hiring good help is difficult. Hiring good help repeatedly is a skill. Building an entire business in an unfamiliar domain is certainly easier
27.
▲
by
oneiftwo
6y ago
Not all work is equally valuable. Not all work is equally doable. Some work requires decades patience and sacrifice before one is competent enough to perform it. Some work is physically or cognitively beyond the vast majority of the populat