omarhaneef

7 ms·

31.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
There would be all kinds of repeated actions, obtaining counter-intuitive objects to get past obscure guards in a way that doesn't quite make sense. I know this because our best (not sarcasm) humans have done the same thing for years.
32.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
The recording is not to understand them — whatever that might end up meaning — but to feel their presence when you miss them.
33.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I did the same thing for the same reason with the same result and am just posting this to concur with what you said: everyone should do this while you are young and have your memory. Which makes me thing: we are relatively young and have
34.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I've spent a lot of money on several HN posts because I came across a service or product that was advertised, so pretty sure people on the other end made some money. (And I was happy to do so.)
35.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I have not tried it, but I believe I could download it and set up the app based on the readme. I would not be confident using it, but I'll give it a try.
36.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I was going to say you should offer a tutorial around how this can be used. It is much more useful to have a walk through when people put out such products. And then I decided not to say that because it is up to you how to spend your time a
37.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Sorry if this is newbie question but do I have to keep this at home or is there someone who will let me plug into their power and bandwidth for peanuts?
38.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I wish I knew what was ultraprocessed. > "Ultraprocessed foods are defined as "industrial formulations of food substances (oils, fats, sugars, starch, and protein isolates) that contain little or no whole foods and typically in
39.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
This was much more interesting than I expected. I have always been interested in how other people work, prioritize, think, their workflow and tools, and this really spoke to that interest. Here were some surprises: -- I was much more intere
40.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Agree with whomever said options but it should be noted that the higher derivatives “lurk” in the lower ones in real life. Example: a simple change in position means that the object had to move or experience two changes in velocity (startin
41.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
This confirms what I’ve long suspected: Daniel Dennett is a robot!
42.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Same story as pretty much everyone else here (c64, most of these same books, typed basic) I just looked back and I think these are some of the best written books. Thinking on it there were probably dozens of programming books but these endu
43.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Me too! And my second brief thought was: maybe they forgot to turn it off for me? Wish I was kidding.
44.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I search for the most up to date and clearly written tutorial I can find that seems highly rated or regarded and then just walk through it.
45.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Absolutely. But in this case the author claims he does know which half. That’s what the whole paper is really about: figuring out which half. (Not saying you have to agree with him)
46.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
The point is not to stop investing in VC, but stop investing in the subset of VC that doesn’t measure up to your otherwise available investments. (About half the shots). You can redistribute the same amount of money into the other (better)
47.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
The paper doesn’t say VC risk is high. It says that 50% of the investments are predictably bad and can be safely dropped because there are better risk adjusted alternatives in the public markets (stocks or bonds) and dropping these would bo
48.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
The author complains that developers argue about their tools and methods, insist on their favorite techniques, but produce (more) worse apps. Particularly for the amount of time and effort expended on developing the apps. The thing is: the
49.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Almost all the comments are from those who have tried it. (And most people apparently love it). Why? Because it never tells you what it does. It’s “front end tooling” which could be anything from a new JS target language to a framework to s
50.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
okay, I expected to read another list of 7 questions to ask but this list is really excellent: each question made me think "yes, of course that should be asked and probably is not!" And this is not just for engineers. I think anyo
51.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I wish I could reproduce the passages from memory but as I recall, Tolkien as narrator in LOTR abhorred the cutting down of trees and the development that went on. His protagonists are all nature lovers in the original form, some very direc
52.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
And as a corollary: if you have those, and the company is investable, it follows that what changes in a "down" market is the valuation. The change is dramatic and fast though, and minds take a beat to catch up to the market.
53.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Well, I think this is what they call a semantic argument. All of us want the right "resolution" of management. Some people might say the right level of micromanagement (in your example, the goldilocks micromanagement). You may say
54.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
What would you propose as an alternative? In an alternative universe, ZCW101 is complaining that they said "eliminate micromanagement" and that person is arguing that sometimes you simply have to micromanage and eliminating it i
55.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
Looking at the data, they seem to compare what effective[1] founders do more frequently than ineffective founders, so they do compare the two. The study sort of includes these % gaps in practices of most and least effective founders. [1] ef
56.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
The valuable part of this document is reminding us what to remind them of. I would add: Do you have any private investments? Convertible notes or stocks? Should have a login for AngelList or whatever platform if it’s through one. Then other
57.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I had read the Levine piece, and when I did, I thought: well, if the bot counts were going from 5% to 25% to 50%, then of course then why would it not be an MAE? That is to say, I don't think I felt swayed by him saying it would not be
58.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
okay, you seem to know at least as much as I read, so let me ask you this question: "material adverse effects which is a very high standard that Twitter definitely has not broached" I guess my question is how do we know -- from th
59.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
It is hard to write on this without taking sides. Let's just say I share your intuition about this hypothetical real estate transaction but I am not convinced that it is an appropriate simile. As I read it, his claim is that he didn&#x
60.
by omarhaneef 4y ago
I think this is the right approach: zoom in on the language and discuss what is at stake. So let's talk about the legal leg to stand on part. From his 13d language (amendment #8, filed June 6th, which is public, but I read it on bloomb

More ›