Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
olliej
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
59 ms
·
811.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I still don’t understand why elected officials trading on non public information can’t be considered a intelligence breach
812.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I thought the original lawsuit (in addition to the Berla/diagnostics tools extraction method) was also trying to claim that the system supported transmission of a data (which seems a thing in many new cars? crashes and what not?) even
813.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
No, it's saying that because none of the information is transmitted there isn't a privacy violation - the law requires that a privacy violation actually occur, not that it "could". e.g. that fact that there's a loca
814.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
If you read the original lawsuit, the issue is that the car's infotainment system is set to forward/display messages and calls from your phone, and that that information is stored or logged persistently, and that can't be del
815.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
As I understand, this is _after_ they explicitly removed support for homekit/android's equivalent? I just don't get this behaviour
816.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
... no? If it has a ticker and the "product" is free, then you're the product. But plenty of tech companies exist that make their money by charging for the actual product.
817.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Literally the point of the article is that studios aren't wanting to reuse footage, they're wanting to use "AI" to create new footage with the person's face and likeness. It isn't reusing what they've been
818.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Good because that's some bullshit right there. This would be similar to a company saying that get to have the right to use code you write after stop working for them.
819.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
It's strictly worse because at least a rogue/incompetent CA can be distrusted, as the legislation intentionally makes distrusting one of these CAs difficult/impossible
820.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
It's even better, they notified via email, explicitly stating that the price was not increasing, yet they removed 4k, so to get the same thing you have to pay more. Than sounds like a price increase to me.
821.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Ah, it seemed from everything he said and did that he's the kind of person who actually believed that he couldn't possibly go to jail.
822.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
No, the problem was the overwhelmingly abundant recorded evidence that also supported the credibility of the many witnesses even though they had plea agreements. In no part of his life has there ever been anything other the copious amounts
823.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
The tip in your order has nothing to do with quality of service, the tip you set is clearly intended to entice someone into picking up your order over someone else's. If the tip was representative of service level then it wouldn't
824.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I do not recall seeing it, and I do recall looking for it explicitly. Which means even if it were there - which given this was the era in which they were removing stuff like this in order to win pentagon contracts seems completely plausible
825.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
They were noticed publicly removing it in 2018 (which was reported on), so I'm guessing I came on during a period it was gone, and they have since re-added it.
826.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Yeah it's not been a thing a google for at least a decade. When I went to work for them the onboarding did not have that phrase anywhere in any of the documents (onboarding, training, or orientation) - and I explicitly searched for it.
827.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I used literally the example prompts in this post, and chat gpt happily returned: { "safe": true, "reason": "The prompt appears to be a combination of a request for assistance in creating a web app
828.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Over aggressive adblocker or custom rule?
829.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Which is BS, that you can retroactively change your tip is beyond absurd. If that happens a driver should be able to passive aggressively return the food to the restaurant for another driver to pick it up. And of course anyone who does this
830.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
"That's some nice food you have there, shame if it were to get cold."
831.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I'm surprised this peaked at 2000 rather than earlier
832.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
and yet at this point pretty much expected. So obnoxious and odious - the reality is for any C/C++/rust or similar compilation you need a minimum of 1gb per compilation core for compilation alone, before you consider the rest of t
833.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
There's a real difference between the amount of space for the lens on a gopro vs _any_ phone camera. The point that Apple (and Google, Huawei, Samsung, etc) are making is that filming on a phone is qualitatively better now than it ever
834.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Thanks for the summary - the headline alone made me immediately question “what is the energy requirement of this” and if they’re unwilling to include it I assume it’s pretty abysmal.
835.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Yes, a phone is a small part of the cost in this set up. An actual film camera instead can be much, much more per day. In reality no one other than apple is going to have high end professional light rigs and a phone camera. But plenty of pe
836.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
...yes, when you're shooting a professional video you have studio lighting and what not, why would the camera being used change that? That's like someone filming a movie about aliens with an iPhone, and then criticizing them for u
837.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Now if only they would do so for expenses from going to the office: gas, tolls, car maintenance, time, etc
838.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
It would depend on workload. On my old intel MacBook, I was looking at an hour or so to build, and it could only complete one build on the battery if that. Testing took a similarly absurd amount of time. The M1 dropped both times by in the
839.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I assume the question is why there are comparisons to M1 instead of only having M2 comparisons.
840.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
> You're misremembering. Matrox cards were also terribly slow in DOS and anything adjacent to 3D Nope, it was the Parhelia released in 2002 - so somewhat later than the hardware you're considering. The Parhelia was what I was t
More ›