oldstrangers

11 ms·

91.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
For this particular brand, we spent a lot of time looking at nature, specifically fungal networks / mycelium etc. We also looked at fractals and other items in nature that have a specific mathematical quality to them. Pretty much anyth
92.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Thank you!
93.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Yeah I still need to refine it a little for the smaller screen sizes. The font sizing is variable so it gets smaller the smaller the screen size, but for you it's probably too small.
94.
Building a brand identity with code(zchry.org)
48 points by oldstrangers 3y ago|10 comments
95.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
A philosopher's perspective but still interesting nonetheless.
96.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
ctrl-f that page for 'consciousness' and report back.
97.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
"the mechanics that transformed us from a basic life form to a life form with a consciousness" If those mechanics are known I'd love to hear them.
98.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
I used telnet as a child to pretend I was a hacker. Then I used telnet as a child to actually hack into things. So much fun. And wardialing... Boy did I love wardialing.
99.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Case by case really. Occasionally the client has a preference, occasionally they don't. Most large corporate clients are already familiar with WordPress and partnering them with a managed hosting solution like WP-Engine to handle secur
100.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Despite all of the hate and trouble people seem to have with WordPress, I've had nothing but positive experiences with it for nearly its entire 20 year life. We're putting 5+ clients a month on WordPress (in addition to Webflow).
101.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Housing: Check Veterinarians: Check Healthcare: Check Education: Check Hospice? Check Cool.
102.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Just a little humor.
103.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
NASA handing out money the same way VCs do. No product or proven success, here's a billion.
104.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
I can't believe I've been here since 2010.
105.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Any firm large enough to build AI projects on the scale of ChatGPT will be large enough to bid on Government AI contracts. In which case, there will be zero regulations on what you can and cannot do in terms of "national security"
106.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
I wrote one ( https://solipsismwow.com/#paper ). But it's literally fake. Thanks GPT.
107.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Your definition of a successful product is making it very difficult for to you navigate this conversation. At no point has Facebook provided demonstrable success in regards to what we know as "The Metaverse". Frankly I don't
108.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Metaverse hasn't proven utility or entertainment though?
109.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Also true
110.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
He saw the writing on the wall.
111.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Well the Metaverse as a standalone product then is even more of a failure by every reasonable metric. Could it pop off tomorrow? Sure. Is it? Probably not.
112.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
...he quit because the product was a failure. Which was my point. But sure, here you go. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Abrash And if you don't think one of the richest companies in the world can afford to
113.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
I mean literally off the top of my head, John Carmack? Doesn't really get much better than that in terms of practical on-hands VR research and development. You can check for yourself though: https://research.facebook.com&#x2
114.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Technically they've been building on the Metaverse idea since 2014 when they acquired Oculus. 8 years later and people still do not care about VR.
115.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
They can release it as cranial implant for all that matters, doesn't mean it's going to be a success.
116.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Didn't work out too well for the Metaverse.
117.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
This article isn't even accounting for all the UAP information that has come out in the last 2 years.
118.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
>If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly. Says who? Did I miss the memo? >It's a complete joke. The Pentagon seems to take it seriously enough, even creating the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution
119.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Disinformation? That would imply we're being intentionally misled about what the objects are. In which case, nothing I've said contradicts that, regardless if it's terrestrial based or otherwise.
120.
by oldstrangers 3y ago
Maybe they are, and we're just catching glimpses of the ones that slip through the proverbial cracks?

More ›