okthenletssee

5 ms·

1.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
Even simpler example: you don't get paid for eating food. Does that imply food has no value?
2.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
Leisure time/spare time has value already. People work so that they can afford to have spare time and go on holidays. You have severe misconceptions about economics. People not having to work to survive will just lead to people having
3.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
What rewarding experience has zero financial value? I think you are very wrong about money.
4.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
The call center people use the computer to make excuses. And you overlook the possibility of human error without computer involvement. The classical "a black person mugged me" comes to mind. At the end of the day it is a tool. Law
5.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
The problem with issues like the ones you describe is bad management. Like they may reward their police officers based on the number of arrests or "tickets", not on actual real problems solved. And the data issue is there whether
6.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
Even if the AI identifies many people, there still have to be humans checking them out. The limited number of humans may have more time to check each suspect out than they would have without the AI, because the AI takes over some of the wor
7.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
Computers are only a tool. Humans have to make the final decisions. Under those circumstances, what exactly is the problem? I notice that all the articles warning about AI supervision never mention the error rate of humans. Humans misidenti
8.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
Also, if there is higher prevalence of crime in certain areas, it makes sense to do more policing there. Now it is illegal to detect higher prevalence of crime? This is stupid.
9.
by okthenletssee 6y ago
A couple of billion people have also been added to the workforce at the same time.