Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ohyes
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
181.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
I'd call them a stubborn player. A human can't normally predict out 100 moves of optimal play, so that's why it is jockeying instead of being part of an intricate plan. I mean, it does bring the question, do you play a game f
182.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Quelle surprise, a big tech company making a big tech company move to drive users into their embattled flagship. I take this as a negative indicator of how things are going for Facebook. I don’t see any synergy with oculus other than that b
183.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Well, except the value isn't zero to you, even if you don't use it. It allows a lot of basic government and corporate things to happen (taxes, payroll, sending of legal documents). And it sets a baseline price for mail and package
184.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
You want to kill someone but you can’t because that’s like totally illegal so you just hire a hitman and now it’s just a business expense.
185.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Unfortunately a lot of online recipes and cookbooks are for people looking to make something different and special, not looking for an everyday meal. Being a home cook (as opposed to being a chef) is actually a lot like programming. Learn
186.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
The default should be opting out of these things. I paid hundreds of dollars for the operating system and word processing suite, why do they need to extract more money, and why do i have to opt out of a huge company creeping on me.
187.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
In 1995 individuals would crank out doom WADs and marathon maps like it was nothing. 2.5D was a sweet spot for ease of making something. As a tween with no artistic skill and the family computer I could make maps and mods and texture stuff.
188.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
> before checking if there is any extreme weather along the route the flight is going to take that day. The travel insurance wouldn't pay out if the flight was cancelled due to weather that was already known about.
189.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
The warren buffets and medallion funds of the world have much better information and resources that Joe Loser. EMH just says that all the publicly known information is priced in almost instantaneously... It doesn't say much about how
190.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
This is a huge fuck-up on Robinhood's part, they should have never given him that sort of leverage. Any relatively new investor trading options is also a huge mistake, it is surprising he was approved for an account where he can even u
191.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
This is just a fundamental misunderstanding of what concurrency is. I do not see why it requires a benchmark. Concurrency is many things at once. That's it. Async frameworks end up with better concurrency properties because you're
192.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Are you saying that the economy isn’t just a complicated game that we play to distribute wealth and it had a merit beyond its utility to those playing it? It seems we should rethink the game if it falls over every few years and fails to ser
193.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Right, but we don’t want that. How can we avoid that?
194.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Exactly, that’s why I suggested suspending capitalism, but in which case what do you replace it with? We could of course just give everyone what they would have made, based on last year’s tax returns or whatever, of course this has its ow
195.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
This is an interesting analogy because the roadrunner just runs without looking and everything works out fine. Wile E. Coyote only has problems because he is aware of what a huge mistake he’s made. I don’t know what the behavior analogous t
196.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
yes, excepting that many have trouble with the compilers class. if you get through it and do well you're probably fine.
197.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
Nah, that’s not true. Something like Common Lisp (AOT compiled, btw) you can write without types and then add them in later to bump performance by facilitating unboxing and removal of inline type checks. It is a tradeoff because you lose so
198.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
I agree, that is a very likely cause as well.
199.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
I also feel a lot of the ‘missing out on the great party in 3,000 years’ effect. I want to see what happens when we travel the stars, for example. But I won’t be around to miss out, so potentially I should feel nothing more than what I feel
200.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
I am a fairly depressing person when it comes down to it. Perhaps those things you’re saying could happen, but they don’t seem likely given history. The rich get richer and compound interest compounds. Maybe it will turn our financial syste
201.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
I seem to have struck a nerve. The ‘heat death argument’ is not about 100 years vs. a billion years, it is about the inevitability of things. Even if you live a very very long time it will still not be forever, and we all have to make peace
202.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
You ask a valid question. Not wanting to die is fine, I think more importantly, not wanting to age and gradually become a burden towards end of life is also natural. Not wanting to be lost and missed (nevertheless hoping that you've do
203.
▲
by
ohyes
6y ago
How have you been measuring your cognitive decline? I have much shifted priorities from when I was in my 20s and was never that smart to begin with, so I’m note sure how I would even start to measure it.
204.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
Seems like part of it would be to ensure that you will always be training new pilots. If you have a lot of 'comfortable' pilots, you have less need to do the training, so when you fight a war and start losing pilots, you have less
205.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
Lockdown is entirely about trying desperately to not overwhelm the healthcare system. Do not confuse it with eradication of the virus. If the healthcare system gets overwhelmed you end up with a much higher mortality rate and secondary deat
206.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
Yucca mountain is the wrong solution. We can reprocess nuclear fuel waste easily already, reducing this issue by quite a lot. As a policy issue the United States does not, so you end up with much more “spent fuel” than necessary. Radioactiv
207.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
Chernobyl is not the gold standard for comparison, it was a completely different design (far more dangerous, honestly) from the BWR/PWRs that were built everywhere else.
208.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
>Coal may kill more people, but it doesn't irradiate the surrounding area for hundreds of years if something goes wrong. Actually, coal irradiates the surrounding area when it is working properly, and it adds to global warming at th
209.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
okay not perfectly as it was stuck open, but it did release the pressure as was said.
210.
▲
by
ohyes
7y ago
The relief valve worked perfectly, as they said, there was no steam explosion. Unfortunately too much of the steam was released and the reactor melted.
More ›