ofjcihen

19 ms·

481.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
I need to second all of these points and add in the additional reason I don’t use it often: unless it’s a very common use case and I just need some boilerplate starting code I already know I’m going to spend more time fixing the issues it c
482.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
From a security perspective this tracks. I don’t mean that in a good way.
483.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Yes. Because you know the language
484.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Oh yeah definitely. The context matters. For making CRUD apps or anything that doesn’t involve security or stores sensitive information I 100 percent agree it’s fine. The issue I see is that we get some people storing extremely sensitive in
485.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
I’d take it a step further honestly. You need to be precise and exact but you also have to have enough domain knowledge to know when the LLM is making a huge mistake.
486.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
I’m amazed at the number of adults that think LLMs are “alive”. Let’s be clear, they aren’t, but if you truly believe they are and you still use them then you’re essentially practicing slavery.
487.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Sure, but that’s not what being xenophobic means. Do you think that maybe it’s possible the OP has a problem with the program and that crying racism whenever someone brings it up might actually be hurting your argument?
488.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
I don’t think all immigrants are H1B holders, are they?
489.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
TIL immigrant is a race
490.
Houston Housing Authority Submits Legal Brief Riddled with LLM Hallucinations(houstonchronicle.com)
2 points by ofjcihen 1y ago|0 comments
491.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
It’s preferred method of text. 4o Maintain context and trigger at 1 second intervals. It has no desires of its own. Nothing that motivates it. It’s not conscious.
492.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Sure, so I just tried it with visual and audio input. It does nothing. Because there is not impetus for it to do anything by itself.
493.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
We put the LLM in a loop with no instructions with whatever tools you want. Now what?
494.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Slow doesn’t necessarily mean less creative. In fact it’s been argued that being slow and deliberate actually pulls you out of automated patterns of thinking and gives you time to mull over what you want to say. This is even enhanced when y
495.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
A something defined by someone else, yes. Additionally, thinking organisms don’t get stuck in never ending loops because they can CHOOSE to exit the loop. LLMs don’t have that ability
496.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Absolutely.
497.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Helen Keller did in fact make her demands they just couldn’t be known. In contrast the LLM does nothing of its own volition.
498.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
If I set an LLM in a room by itself what does it do?
499.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
The…reviews. Are those generated as well? The reason I ask is because if you look at the pictures they have subtle issues. A button on top of another button. Not quite correct neck muscles. I’m not going to crap on your project but if they
500.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
This isn’t meant to be a gotcha or anything I swear but you say 6 paying customers and your site says “5000 have already taken advantage of this offer”. Is this maybe something the AI stuck in that you might have accidentally overlooked?
501.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
That’s something I didn’t think about. Thank you
502.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Thanks for this. I’ve recently become very interested in QC and purchased and read Quantum Computation and quantum Information which I think is the standard book on the subject right now. I’m even more interested in applying what I’ve learn
503.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Great article and great system. A little out of scope since the article wasn’t about the finer points of ADHD but I’ve always wondered if we’re being disingenuously hard on ourselves by labeling it a disorder. So many people show the sympto
504.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Only if you don’t mind what comes out :)
505.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Ah, so we’re playing at being shamans. In that case I dub you a mushroom.
506.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
You’re stating this as if determinism has been proven beyond a doubt which is not the case.
507.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
The second part of my response addresses why your response isn’t analogous to what we’re discussing.
508.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
Comparing apples to oranges in your response but I’ll address it anyway. I see this take brought up quite a bit and it’s honestly just plain wrong. For starters Junior engineers can be held accountable. What we see currently is people leavi
509.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
True, but I bet grandpa knows enough to identify when a paralegal has made a case losing mistake ;)
510.
by ofjcihen 1y ago
No, it can’t. Partially stems from the garbage the models were trained on. Example anecdata but since we started having our devs heavily use agents we’ve had a resurgence of mostly dead vulnerabilities such as RCEs (CVE in 2019 for example)

More ›