off_sounder

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by off_sounder 4y ago

   The intent of the first amendment is to give individuals the freedom to express their thoughts freely, without any legal repercussions. It's a universal human right, and its implementation into law is irrelevant to any philosophical di
2. 2.▲
   by off_sounder 5y ago

   Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't we be looking at whether the people at the bottom gained more wealth, rather than what percentage of the gains they hold? The wealthy will always have more opportunities bc of the 80/20
3. 3.▲
   by off_sounder 5y ago

   I'm skeptical about the efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine over longer periods of time. I've still not heard a reasonable explanation about why this vaccine is expected to work long-term when the flu shot clearly does not. Especia
4. 4.▲
   by off_sounder 5y ago

   Wrong again, bc you're leaving out intent. People aren't taking the vaccine bc they don't want to inadvertantly put themselves in harm's way, not bc they want to infect other people. Or maybe they're like me, and ha
5. 5.▲
   by off_sounder 5y ago

   Your wrong. That's like saying a taxi cab driver who drove a criminal to a place where he committed a murder is partly responsible for the crime. The virus is the thing that's causing harm. You can't blame an individual for b