oerdnj

4 ms·

1.
by oerdnj 3y ago
This means that ISC is relying heavily on libuv and we want to see it improved for everyone, not just ISC and BIND 9. Nothing more and nothing less, and I would appreciate if we can avoid the partisanship discussion.
2.
by oerdnj 3y ago
And adding io_uring support for networking operations is underway in the same manner. ISC is sponsoring the work.
3.
Are homogenic nameserver names a single point of failure?(medium.com)
3 points by oerdnj 9y ago|0 comments
4.
New Features in Knot DNS 2.0(en.blog.nic.cz)
4 points by oerdnj 11y ago|0 comments
5.
by oerdnj 12y ago
> It's nice that they have tests. Thank you. > Not enough tests to back up all their claims about standards compliance and interoperability As a part of each major release testing we replay a terabytes of real traffic to be sure
6.
by oerdnj 12y ago
No EDNS0 (with DNS-over-TCP defaulting to off), no DNSSEC? This is very very sad reading. But hey, if it works for you, then no worries :).
7.
by oerdnj 12y ago
> Why would I prefer this over NSD? Don't drop NSD, it's a cool piece of software and folks at NLnetLabs are our friends :). My advice would be to run at least two different pieces of software in any deployment since any softw
8.
by oerdnj 12y ago
> Lots of great stuff coming out of CZ.NIC - if you're reading this, keep it up! Thank you very much! > gdnsd ( https://github.com/blblack/gdnsd ), primarily due to the GSLB features Knot DNS already have simi
9.
by oerdnj 12y ago
Hi jingo, > I like CZ.NIC because they are utilising dnscurve. we don't use dnscurve nor promote it. I am sorry, but we strongly believe in standards that are widely accepted among DNS community. > But when I try to compile kno
10.
Knot DNS: A high-performance, authoritative DNS server(lwn.net)
85 points by oerdnj 12y ago|33 comments