Hi jingo, > I like CZ.NIC because they are utilising dnscurve. we don't use dnscurve nor promote it. I am sorry, but we strongly believe in standards that a

Hi jingo, > I like CZ.NIC because they are utilising dnscurve. we don't use dnscurve nor promote it. I am sorry, but we strongly believe in standards that are widely accepted among DNS community. > But when I try to compile knot it demands a lot more resources than compiling djbdns (tinydns), or nsd. A bit too much IMO. I don't know how about you, but compilation is one time event per version, but reading the zones can happen very often. So the memory used to compile zone parser doesn't worry me much. Anyway to lower the compilation resources you can just pass --disable-fastparser to ./configure invocation (that will use -T0 instead of -G2 for ragel; see 5.11 Choosing a Generated Code Style in ragel PDF documentation). Just as a remark - it makes me very sad when you and other people hijack the discussion with djbdns and it's old feuds. I have no idea how f.e. daemontools or ucspi are related to Knot DNS (unless... you can run knotd under daemontools if you want...)