4 ms·
In this case CSS-Tricks got paid $4m first, so probably the wrong entity to be complaining about funding. But maybe the lead editor in question who’s not the cr
by oefrha 18d ago
In this case CSS-Tricks got paid $4m first, so probably the wrong entity to be complaining about funding. But maybe the lead editor in question who’s not the creator didn’t see much of that?
- boredpudding 18d agoCSS-Tricks didn't get paid $4m. They got acquired. The previous owner of CSS-Tricks got $4m.
- oefrha 18d agoGot acquired => got paid. CSS-Tricks the entity (up to the point of acquisition) got paid the money. If and how the money was divided between the people involved doesn’t seem be public info.
- geoffgraham 18d agoIt wasn't divided.
- oefrha 18d ago[flagged]