oaiey

34 ms·

571.
by oaiey 4y ago
never explain a joke! :)
572.
by oaiey 4y ago
XML was flawed due to XHTML. The key spec was XML Infoset. It removed many capabilities what XML had and focused on data transfer not document representation. That is basically JSON but more powerful (comments + namespaces + attributes). Pe
573.
by oaiey 4y ago
Maybe not a popular thing to say: A schema capability is needed. You want to verify input. You want to contract among partners. You want to Intellisense something in a code editor. And is schema languages a complicated beast: Hell yes. Do w
574.
by oaiey 4y ago
And then history repeats and we call this now blockchain and the mess around it ;)
575.
by oaiey 4y ago
XSLT was also a terrible combination of two principles: Imperative coding + data pattern matching. For a novice beginner - and me at the time - I was never clear which pattern to use and how it best fit together.
576.
by oaiey 4y ago
I recommend anyone separate VLAN for your work at home environment. The company might spy but far more importantly, the risk of viral infections and hacks is so dramatically higher in a company than you alone at home with your family.
577.
by oaiey 4y ago
Also for the users. For my part, I appreciate if stuff looks modern. I understand the whitespace madness complaints, but a software which looks like 1999 is not something I want to work with. There is a degree of modern style needed because
578.
by oaiey 4y ago
Well .. the root servers and DNS platform in general provide name resolution. Traditionally we think that as a feature/function name -> IP. But there non functional aspects also to consider. Distribution is one (DNS is really good o
579.
by oaiey 4y ago
Greefield / New Formed Teams: I agree 100%. Was not that the Stripe Engineering story before Pandemia. Two remote divisions and one in office? But brownfield with an existing organization: That does not work. What if you have a team wi
580.
by oaiey 4y ago
Azure. When you google long enough you will find interviews with the key people behind ASP.NET Core and .NET Core about their proposal meeting with Guthrie (the head of Azure) and how surprised how easy that was to get that approved. Same a
581.
by oaiey 4y ago
that assumes competency of someone to have a real strategy and then competency to conceal it because it is a timebomb waiting to explode. Too complicated ;).
582.
by oaiey 4y ago
The problem of that thinking is that a single remote-only-possible person pushes the team to remote-only. I however, 100% agree with the statement that conferences are problem (1) for coming back to the office AND (2) is the fact that commu
583.
by oaiey 4y ago
You are right. But even the "scripting" part of Unity is very much optimized for performance.
584.
by oaiey 4y ago
My apologies for this mess of a comment. Auto completion is a disaster for me
585.
by oaiey 4y ago
Good question. Will have a look.
586.
by oaiey 4y ago
Yes, you are right. It is the pre heater. Maybe i understood defrosting the wrong way.
587.
by oaiey 4y ago
There are a surprising numbers of .NET game engines. Ranging from Unity, over Gadot to things like this one here. .NET is nowadays a very different beast that the .NET Framework. Maui is not the relevant factor. The modernization of the run
588.
by oaiey 4y ago
That defrosting feature is very expensive. Move triggered early December for like 5 days. It runs at 1000W permanently. In our lovely energy process this translate to 15€ a day or 450€ if run for a full month. Switched it off air exchange f
589.
by oaiey 4y ago
I disagree here. If you have a functional environment you can have a team meeting, clarify everything there openly and have 1:1 once you need them due to privacy. Regular 1:1 create the risk of micromanaging people and foster secrecy. It is
590.
by oaiey 4y ago
My comments (from this little information): 1. Empowering others frees yourselves and build teams. Never stop empowering others. You will be more successful in the long run. If the environment is competing you against your peers, leave the
591.
by oaiey 4y ago
It is not NATO which enforces that. It is the superior spending and technology the overlord ;) is producing which makes every competing product a tough sell regards its pricing. And yes, you spent your money with friendly nations.
592.
by oaiey 4y ago
At that point work becomes a hobby (or a psychologic need) but yes, basic income is awesome.
593.
by oaiey 4y ago
That is very close to if not monopolistic behavior.
594.
by oaiey 4y ago
Because people deserve a livable wage. If it is a full time job, it needs to be paid good enough to eat, live and have shelter. Everything else is a hobby (and considering another comment, that is even true for some). It is that simple. Hum
595.
by oaiey 4y ago
Same also applies to energy. Also there, all energy (nuclear, renewable, oil/natural gas, ...) is "mixed" and consumers take what is at the end of the pipe (think about a energy supply contract from pure renewables).
596.
by oaiey 4y ago
Take my upvote ;)
597.
by oaiey 4y ago
The Microsoft paragraph was pointless and wrong in many places. NT as a cross over of DOS and VMS? It is more that the VMS tech virtualized DOS like a good VMS stack at that time did with many things (as did NT with POSIX, win32 and OS&#x2
598.
by oaiey 4y ago
Or in other words: A US company thinks the local requirements are not relevant to them, squeeze an amount of the GDP out of the countries and then complain that the locals complain? No fee applied could ever get the money back lost before.
599.
by oaiey 4y ago
Correct. When it is a legal layoff (they rarely are) then the work council and the company have to develop a plan which includes factors like these.
600.
by oaiey 4y ago
In Germany any lawyer (or the work council) will block you from getting fired (because Google has no legal reason to fire you). What they do here in Germany is to negotiate to mutually void your contract by you accepting a financial package

More ›