The Microsoft paragraph was pointless and wrong in many places. NT as a cross over of DOS and VMS? It is more that the VMS tech virtualized DOS like a good VMS

The Microsoft paragraph was pointless and wrong in many places. NT as a cross over of DOS and VMS? It is more that the VMS tech virtualized DOS like a good VMS stack at that time did with many things (as did NT with POSIX, win32 and OS/2) and below Intel, MIPS, alpha and whatever the forth was.