nsonha

39 ms·

751.
by nsonha 3y ago
the only time you run type-checker is on CI. For the majority of the time you only need the code to compute and your editor/IDE should already have its own bundled type-checker. Unless bun has its own type-checker which means it has to
752.
by nsonha 3y ago
You can also ask why every node server traverses the file system to load dependencies at runtime instead of build time. Packaging your server with bun build can be the answer to both.
753.
by nsonha 3y ago
Bundler for backend vs bundler for FE
754.
by nsonha 3y ago
if the goal is to be an alternative runtime (which it is actually claimed to be), I don't think I like these non-standard APIs. I however find Bun more useful as a Swiss army knives, to use with nodejs, to reduce the number of developm
755.
by nsonha 3y ago
is there such a thing as running TS natively? Even tsc doesn't do that.
756.
by nsonha 3y ago
many people have commented, bun is all the tools in a single dependency: a test runner with in-memory db included? Shell support for window? Single file executable packaging? with macros? Code scratchpad that auto-installs dependencies? Pro
757.
by nsonha 3y ago
Doesnt node have a built-in test runner too these days?
758.
by nsonha 3y ago
I remember watching one of his show's episode on Apple TV about GameStop and somehow he thought the problem was the (deliberate) obscurity of modern financial systems (instead of, say, how stock trading creates wrong incentives for a h
759.
by nsonha 3y ago
Why not generate something less opinionated like plain css instead of tailwind.
760.
by nsonha 3y ago
who needs this feature? If there is a need for it this should be done in the browser anyway.
761.
by nsonha 3y ago
I'm still waiting to this idiotic unlappable design trend to pass and some company to come up with a 2-piece convertible similar to the original surface book.
762.
by nsonha 3y ago
Would be more willing to be a guinea pig if there is more info on what will be removed. There are bloats in my Samsung phone but there are also useful features unique to it that I wanna keep (eg DEX), or things that if removed may break the
763.
by nsonha 3y ago
"Complexity bad so let's do complexity in a different way"
764.
by nsonha 3y ago
why are they calling a CMS a DB?
765.
by nsonha 3y ago
what a shocking news
766.
by nsonha 3y ago
you mean a json to yaml converter?
767.
by nsonha 3y ago
lol what
768.
by nsonha 3y ago
> People nowadays use "Asia" only to refer to East Asia. No, Asia in that sense often refers to East & South East Asia. People will use "East Asia" if they mean so.
769.
by nsonha 3y ago
"Asia" is too broad, the Japanese and Chinese are on the extreme side of this spectrum, but it's not like that in South East Asia and I'd imagine south asians to not even drink.
770.
by nsonha 3y ago
> the ungodly amounts of javascript you end up for the simplest problems replace javascript with any native programming language, this has been always a problem with UI programming, but it's not THAT big of a problem because in othe
771.
by nsonha 3y ago
I did say "generally"
772.
by nsonha 3y ago
yes, the problem with the narrative is that web apps that are logic heavy are lumped together with content based sites who cannot justify their code bloat.
773.
by nsonha 3y ago
are you deliberately not getting the point for some reason? How big is considered bloated in native apps, how big can a native app can get before it hurts accessibility because people cannot download it? Is it a few MB? Web apps are soon go
774.
by nsonha 3y ago
however big, you're only required download an app once. Next time there is an update that you cannot download, generally that won't block you from using the app at that point in time.
775.
by nsonha 3y ago
it's always bothered me that this dogma exists. Somehow web apps need to be super frugal with code size, while apps distributed on other (native) platforms never have such a problem. Somehow it's the bloated web that blocks the ac
776.
by nsonha 3y ago
> “New UI” that’s minimal and a cheap knock off of VSCode Equating being minimal with being cheap sounds about as smart as equating IDE with its UI. IDE is about functionalities not how big/small buttons are or how many panels you c
777.
by nsonha 3y ago
I don't understand what it does in an inversion of control article, because it's just the opposite of IoC. Further more, instead of trying to actually manage your dependencies by giving components the signatures that document the
778.
by nsonha 3y ago
Kinda related, I assume accessibility commercial products to be more expensive. Is there any government incentive to help with that?
779.
by nsonha 3y ago
I have never seen a formatter talked about this much, it is just a formatter and code is not poem, Jesus.
780.
by nsonha 3y ago
Their software counterpart seems nice. I have only had experienced with Yandex browser though, at the time I liked to try out different browser to find what work best. Yandex was minimal looking on both mobile and desktop and had nice featu

More ›