nsnzjznzbx

4 ms·

1.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Thanks! Paid the debt in 6 days got bored.
2.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
No. A lot of the Australian ads play on the "this gimmick feature means if you lose you win!" What it aleays means is you still win or lose a bet they just shuffled the permutations so that you win and lose in different outcomes.
3.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Emulator link?
4.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
We will get to the point where you can quickly bootstrap i.e. an LLM can train a better LLM in a loop, leave it and it can really learn. Like learn learn. "Train yourself to solve this problem see OBJECTIVE.md"
5.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Not having that is a feature IMO. At work I wrote an .md and asked Rovo (similar to Claude Code) to check it. In similar news I'll probably stop the tab suggestions in GH Copilot now and just agent all the things.
6.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Oh that is a good use case. Don't connect to email and all that insecure stuff. But as a sandbox for "try this out and deploy a demo". Got me thinking!
7.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
They sound like cartoon voices... but I really like them I could listen to a book with those.
8.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
So you saying mashups were literally just connecting 2 things and selling it.
9.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Isn't almost everyone doing that. Deploy docker to AWS connecting to Slack, Open AI and Anthropic to do X Y Z.
10.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
A great AI future is the robots doing stuff so we can be free. But none of the major isms are geared up to provide that i.e. capitalism or communism. Maybe hackable with UBI and capitalism mix.
11.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
You need a science museum!
12.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
I would rather have more housing than less though. Government can build it at scale without worrying about profit. And privately built appartment blocks are awful. One cracked in Sydney had to be evacuated. Concrete cancer and water ingress
13.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Not really. Since a lot of code are tradeoffs and decisions made by programmers but the business spec is met either way.
14.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Because I grew up in the UK and there is a fuckton of government housing from 60s and 70s. It is ugly but it is housing people. Government doesn't need to make a profit due to taxation.
15.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Electron.js took this concept a bit too far.
16.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
So Abraham de Moivre was the worlds first quant?
17.
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
But building cost > sale value is possible. Or land ends up better value left as suburban house than developing up. Or they build where sale cost - build cost is maximized. I.e. different city. Governments need to build more housing. Mak