3 ms·
Because I grew up in the UK and there is a fuckton of government housing from 60s and 70s. It is ugly but it is housing people. Government doesn't need to make
by nsnzjznzbx 7mo ago
Because I grew up in the UK and there is a fuckton of government housing from 60s and 70s. It is ugly but it is housing people.
Government doesn't need to make a profit due to taxation.
- ghufran_syed 7mo ago[flagged]
- locknitpicker 7mo ago> like the fine example of Grenfell tower The Grenfell tower fire was caused by a renovation intended to improve thermal insulation. The renovation project used an external thermal insulation system that failed to meet both the manufacturer's recommendation and building regulation requirements. The particular system was actually banned in the UK while it was installed. Tell me why you believe this has anything to do with public housing.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- tomhow 7mo agoPlease don't introduce an isolated tragedy to engage in ideological battle. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- vasco 7mo agoHello https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/abstract.asp?index=11984 https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/abstract.asp?index=1... UK public housing is widely known for being shit. Unsafe, puts all the poor people together in a block. There's bunch of crime, and your kids will be likely to stay stuck there or go to jail due to bad influences. Social housing should be sprinkled around it has been found. So nice example of what I was saying.
- nsnzjznzbx 7mo agoI would rather have more housing than less though. Government can build it at scale without worrying about profit. And privately built appartment blocks are awful. One cracked in Sydney had to be evacuated. Concrete cancer and water ingress issues. It is concrete enshittification.
- vasco 7mo agoThe question is not if, but who and how.