nsaslideface

7 ms·

31.
Two presidential electors encourage colleagues to sideline Trump(politico.com)
3 points by nsaslideface 10y ago|0 comments
32.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
"New technology usurps romanticization of older technology" is not a new and surprising concept. One could replace "pill" and "spring of fresh water" with any technological advancement which took over some earl
33.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
This assertion reminds of the array of figures in our media and daily life who reflexively attribute extreme violence committed by white men to mental illness. It's further unconvincing given your context; if you are steadfastly commit
34.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
Why assume individualized mental issues when the actions of anti-feminist men, including expressing belief in a "war on men", can be interpreted at perfectly strategic, if you recognize the existence of social classes with class i
35.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
I feel this article tries to make plain-old masculinity interesting and complex, but it just isn't. Bullying exists on a spectrum of violence. There is no reason to assume there must be a categorical separation between verbal/text
36.
When the Genius Men of Silicon Valley Suddenly Don't Seem So Smart(theintercept.com)
27 points by nsaslideface 10y ago|38 comments
37.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
Hopefully when they're done with this project they can return their resources to their NYC Google Express service and stop forcing customers to order their food and water to arrive only within 8am-10pm periods instead of the previous 3
38.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
Why is population decline from the current levels inherently bad again?
39.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
This is a committee that includes Peter King we're talking about. https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/ responds: "BREAKING: Government officials dislike those who expose their illegal surveillance and trigger glob
40.
by nsaslideface 10y ago
The FDA must regulate the contents of some consumable goods; can you provide a better model of governance than the current one which dictates where the line is to what the FDA can or cannot regulate? Or even a more philosophical explanati