3 ms·
Why assume individualized mental issues when the actions of anti-feminist men, including expressing belief in a "war on men", can be interpreted at perfectly st
by nsaslideface 10y ago
Why assume individualized mental issues when the actions of anti-feminist men, including expressing belief in a "war on men", can be interpreted at perfectly strategic, if you recognize the existence of social classes with class interests? Is it not more likely that these are conscious attempts at guilting undecided women away from reading/listening to other women's words?
- tptacek 10y agoPerhaps I just prefer to think the best of people.
- nsaslideface 10y agoThis assertion reminds of the array of figures in our media and daily life who reflexively attribute extreme violence committed by white men to mental illness. It's further unconvincing given your context; if you are steadfastly committed to assuming the best in others, even men who identify with the "anti-feminist" label, do you ever object to PopeHat's constant gleeful mockery of the occasional "extreme" statements from "SJWs", and feel those guys should be strictly charitable? Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't seem to add up to me.