noxer

18 ms·

181.
by noxer 5y ago
You might wanna look up the The Babylon Bee (Satire) twitter incident. "Allowed" doesn't mean anything on Twitter. People get punished for thing that do not break the rules including obvious satire. Elon is completely right T
182.
by noxer 5y ago
Having goals that can not be reached in time doesn't mean his goals are fake or that he doesn't mean to achieve them. There is zero sign that his support for free speech is a spontaneous idea that he will lose interest about in a
183.
by noxer 5y ago
Hes very much pro free speech why would he be the wrong person? He doesn't have to become the CEO anything if he has enough influence trough his shares he can push twitter to be more open about how it make stuff trending and prevents o
184.
by noxer 5y ago
No, you are confused, no one questions that people are indeed getting banned for "hate speech". This just doesn't proof that "hate speech" is an actual thing with a definition. It just means that it is in fact used
185.
by noxer 5y ago
No, I'm not. You actually just did that. I talked about hate-speech laws as one thing and hate-speech in ToS and similar rules/guidelines as another thing. They are absolutely not the same or similar but face the same problem name
186.
by noxer 5y ago
These channels are only blocked if you have "the wrong" phone number (blame the local gov) So other people mirror these blocked channels and to easy find them, they "mirror" the name too. Its basically the Streisand effe
187.
by noxer 5y ago
But morality claims to define right and wrong based on logic not consensus. Consensus changes and is also often confused with "acceptance" like for example a majority of people accepts some kind of legal abortions that doesn'
188.
by noxer 5y ago
Over the years many people pointed to "Real Time with Bill Maher - Ben Affleck, Sam Harris and Bill Maher Debate Radical Islam" as the start of public toxic woke-ism. I suggest watching it if you have not seen it (10min long) but
189.
by noxer 5y ago
There is no such thing as "hate-speech" there is just speech that (some) people hate and almost anything fall user that if it has some kind of complexity. That's one of the core problems with hate-speech laws and ToS. You can
190.
by noxer 5y ago
Mostly all of the "morality" people live by are fashion. Sure you can craft some example of "pure evil" if you want to but they hardly have any relevance in people every day life. For all the popular "morally right
191.
by noxer 5y ago
According to Durov Telegram does not have servers in Russia.
192.
by noxer 5y ago
Both still up if you live in a place that respects free speech. Not telegrams fault that they are forced to respect certain local law. Also a bird told me that you need to write blocked channel names backwards if want to see what your gov d
193.
by noxer 5y ago
Switzerland was neutral during WWII. You may just have a simplistic idea of what Swiss neutrality means. It certainly does not mean that the well-being of their own people is sacrificed for some kind of morally righteous "neutral"
194.
by noxer 5y ago
Thats your opinion and you have zero evidence for it. While I have the official statement from the Swiss gov + the timeline of their actions. BTW they declined sanctions and only after the EU sanction where in place and they reviews them th
195.
by noxer 5y ago
The goal is to make someone in Russia assassinate Putin, it has become obvious by now that this is the propaganda goal of "the west". Some even open compare it to the assassination attempt(s) against Hitler. I have no clue how pro
196.
by noxer 5y ago
Its exactly the other way around the sanctions of others pushed them in a non-neutral position where they would allow Russia to circumvent sanctions through Switzerland and Switzerland would profit from this war. THAT is the reason why they
197.
by noxer 5y ago
"Swiss neutrality" is its own "thing" its not the same as "military neutrality" its a very broad concept that does include military neutrality but many more things that aren't part of the dictionary defini
198.
by noxer 5y ago
"Several countries which are historically neutral, such as Switzerland [...] have agreed to sanctions." This implies that Switzerland neutrality is somehow relevant while in reality it is not. It implies sanctions DESPITE neutrali
199.
by noxer 5y ago
No absolutely not. But the Swiss neutrality is a broad concept/principle not a strictly defined set of actions that the gov can or can not do. The sanction against Russia for example are not in conflict with the neutrality principle de
200.
by noxer 5y ago
I didn't say its Wikipedia fault or that they did anything other than what they claim to do "pick up the stuff form other places". But wrong is still wrong and wrong is not useful. And even thou I know its wrong I have no way
201.
by noxer 5y ago
I didn't read it all but wasn't hard to find "mistakes" in that wiki article For example: "Several countries which are historically neutral, such as Switzerland and Singapore have agreed to sanctions." Clearly
202.
by noxer 5y ago
I think you overestimate who actually write and edits articles on Wikipedia. Its a very very very small group of people who does 80% and then an other small group who does 19% and then you have the millions of random people with internet wh
203.
by noxer 5y ago
There is nothing to fix, as you can see from the comments here most of NH thinks Wikipedia is neutral and objective and what not. This is the actual problem. People haven't figured out yet how bad it is because there is simply nothing
204.
by noxer 5y ago
In chess the end justifies all means. You can win with only the king left doesn't matter if the others died form radiation and it also doesn't matter if the chess board is still usable after the game.
205.
by noxer 5y ago
Most of these wealthy people there are Jewish and according to Putin's propaganda Ukraine needs to be freed from Nazis. I'm sure most of these wealthy people support the war and probably knew in advance and protected most of their
206.
by noxer 5y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30494956
207.
by noxer 5y ago
They are! Neutral as in "does not participate in armed conflicts between other states". People just have a huge misconception of what the "neutrality" in "Swiss neutrality" really means. See https://
208.
by noxer 5y ago
Neutral as in "does not participate in armed conflicts between other states". No clue where the interpretation comes from that this "neutrality" is extended to basically everything around the topic of war or military. Sw
209.
by noxer 5y ago
Where did I say that? I didn't. Anything else?
210.
by noxer 5y ago
Wont further reply you obviously intentional twist everything I said to the opposite. Have a nice day.

More ›