noxer

38 ms·

361.
Definitive Account of the CIA/Media/BigTech Fraud(greenwald.substack.com)
142 points by noxer 5y ago|72 comments
362.
by noxer 5y ago
Its completely impossible to have any business that is carbon negative. From the person working there that exhales carbon dioxide all days long to every physical items and energy that was somewhere involved in the creation and operation of
363.
by noxer 5y ago
>You can claim that for everyone who got jailed for speech. Name the case. The burden of proof lies with you if you clame people get jailed for speech. I posted a case from Germany. So if you have one from the US post it. No one in the t
364.
by noxer 5y ago
>This just shows the lack of understand what free speech means.
365.
by noxer 5y ago
IIRC the CEO of Twitter did lie to congress recently and nothing happened to him. It seem like its not a lie if you cant proof that what someone said was known to be wrong at that time by the person who said it.
366.
by noxer 5y ago
Doesn't matter, people want a solution now and no one expects it to be forever. The user who asked is unlikely to waste time in such a community in 10 years anyway.
367.
by noxer 5y ago
Thats just a "legal scam" and you know because if they would actually be successful trading they would not bother selling newsletters.
368.
by noxer 5y ago
Someone is going to miss the sell-off by approximately 45 days /s
369.
by noxer 5y ago
Complete nonsense, all of it and completely irrelevant if used as an alternative to reddit none of that crypto/security/privacy nonsense maters at all. You have zero of that on reddit or FB or any other social media and its comple
370.
by noxer 5y ago
Name a single place and the law that is remotely comparable to the 1st amendment. It doesn't exist. There are some analogue yes but they all have exceptions like the one mentioned above where arbitrary the holocaust is excluded or cert
371.
by noxer 5y ago
Complete nonsense. If you voluntarily agree to not leak secrets and do so anyway its not protected under free speech. You also dont get jailed for speech but for the act of breaching some agreement or other law.
372.
by noxer 5y ago
Its not right or left or conservative its anti-authoritarian it makes perfect sense that "hippies" are now considered anti-vaxer. They want to decide what "drug" they inject and no gov should decide what isn't allow
373.
by noxer 5y ago
Telegram is just like reddit in this regards. Its up to the user to make and enforce content rules in a closed community. If you want a channel/group with only very specific content then make it somewhat hard for stupid people to gain
374.
by noxer 5y ago
hurr durr [insert basic telegram hate here] hurr durr
375.
by noxer 5y ago
Maybe, but nonetheless OP is looking for a palace NOW and since it lasted for 8 years it may as well last for another few.
376.
by noxer 5y ago
2003 was the per-spoonfeeding era.
377.
by noxer 5y ago
>This is a bold and unsubstantiated claim. I'm fine with that but its non the less the hard truth there is nothing like the 1st amendment in any other place. >For other actions that are protected under the 1st amendment? Depends.
378.
by noxer 5y ago
Everyone moved to telegram. They host your "offensive" memes and chats, they dont care. Right-wing, left-wing whatever you can post it there. You cant call for violence or show violence, like gore content and terrorist videos do g
379.
by noxer 5y ago
Makes no sense, Trump is pro vaccine and has been from the beginning.
380.
by noxer 5y ago
Ursula Haverbeck is currently in a German prison at the age of 92 for the "crime" of verbal holocaust denial aka for speech. There is no free speech anywhere in Europe. And there is no doubt she would be free in every state in the
381.
by noxer 5y ago
Not sure whats you point or argument, none questioned the existence of humans captcha solvers.
382.
by noxer 5y ago
But humans are expensive and dont scale well even if done by exploiting poor people. If you would raise the PoW to cost more than that the average user would simply be unable to solve the PoW it in a meaningful time on their hardware.
383.
by noxer 5y ago
You misses the point. It does not matter what kind of technical implementation or algorithm is used. If the average user hardware can solve the "captcha" in a meaningful time on average hardware then an attacker with optimized har
384.
by noxer 5y ago
Its a HTML meta tag that contains an address where to send/stream money similar to an email address but for value not text. The websites backed ofc revives data about that payment in real time and can change the content of the website
385.
by noxer 5y ago
Not sure if that is joke but Bitcoin mining is already highly optimized and done on scale. Beating the average smartphones in-browser hash power does absolutely nothing. You are not competing against them you compete against large scale min
386.
by noxer 5y ago
We can already stream money with https://webmonetization.org/docs/explainer/ Doesn't matter if the underling "wallet" is a blockchain or some other ledger like system.
387.
by noxer 5y ago
>The goal was to prevent spam It does not. Its broken the day someone who can code wants to beak it. >The user is not as affected by the cost... Its exactly the opposite it affects the user not an attacker who can generate millions of
388.
by noxer 5y ago
It runs on a quantum AI blockchain and has recently been rewritten in rust /s
389.
by noxer 5y ago
There is no way to prevent people from optimizing PoW for spamming. Generating 1MM units of PoW will always be more efficient than 1MM people generating each 1 unit of PoW. Optimization always works better at scale. Therefore an attacker al
390.
by noxer 5y ago
CAPTCHA are meant to exclude computers. PoW does not do this at all. This is completely missing the point. An attacker can easily an cheaply generate way more PoW than a legitimate user by optimizing their system. This is just an "unsk

More ›