nosegoes

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nosegoes 10y ago

   Not to mention the fact that child molestation, for example, is almost never reported at the time by the child, or is hushed up by the family, etc. It is impossible to know the true re-offense rate for sex crimes because reporting is so low
2. 2.▲
   by nosegoes 10y ago

   Data is tainted by the fact that robbery is nearly always reported, whereas sex crimes (especially against children) often never are. EDIT for source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/us/rate-of-child-se
3. 3.▲
   by nosegoes 10y ago

   >I think your state may be unique, or at least in a minority. Fair enough. Ranking sex offenders in such a way should certainly be the norm.
4. 4.▲
   by nosegoes 10y ago

   >We must avoid "one-size-fits-all" labels for those convicted of a broad range of offenses. I don't know what the author is going on about. At least in my state (WA), sex offenders are registered on a spectrum from I to II