noitpmeder

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   Give it a shot and report back when you get them merged
2. 62.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   So wouldn't the fact that settlements are pouring in literally prove other can do it too?
3. 63.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   How about just letting the user choose, instead of foisting your own idea of 'right' on them. If I was the US blessed feed, let me have it. If I wasn't the Chinese maintained one, why not. Or, even better, let me make my own!
4. 64.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   Wouldn't it be awesome if that X post was satire? Wishful thinking ...
5. 65.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   This case reads like a single individual suing these companies What is to stop other individuals from filing the same suit and expecting similar outcomes?
6. 66.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   This sounds like a net negative for the end user
7. 67.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   Replicate this <slop> Ok! Here's <more slop>
8. 68.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   AI generating references seems like a hop away from absolute unverifiable trash.
9. 69.▲
   by noitpmeder 9mo ago

   I mean your methodology also sounds suspect. You're just going down a list until it sticks. You don't care where it ends up (I'm sure within reason) just as long as it is accepted and published somewhere (again, within reason
10. 70.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    I can tell you for a fact this exact behavior, aggressive manager included, exists at my company. Thankfully they're in a different org/reporting line, but this exists in the real world.
11. 71.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    Video is great, came up in my youtube recommendation cycle last week. Honestly one of the better things youtube has pitched to me, the quality/relevance of the rest of its recommendations have been nose diving over the last year (or so
12. 72.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    You're not verifying the observable behavior of your application? lmao
13. 73.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    I think you're being overly pessimistic about the chance this exists in some form at nearly every mid-to-large size software company. It doesn't take a company policy for an ai-enabled engineer to start absolutely spewing slop. Bu
14. 74.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    I wish it were easier to have ephemeral interactions with companies. Why do I need a tracked and maintained user profile for things like Uber? Shouldnt it be possible to only interact for the single transaction, ending as soon as I leave th
15. 75.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    They're basically jackboots, I have to imagine almost entirely composed of the republican far right. Just imagine the echo chamber that exists within their ranks. They literally just murdered someone in cold blood. Textbook execution w
16. 76.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    I agree, but in this hypothetical situation the HR part needs to happen, despite the fact that most people don't want to be the squeaky wheel that explicitly starts pointing fingers.. It's way too easy to pretend the system is the
17. 77.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    This current administration and their policies have definitely influenced my opinion on the 2018 debate around citizenship questions on the US census. (For more context: https://www.tbf.org/blog/2018/march/und
18. 78.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    I don't think the sentiment the poster you're interacting with is anything novel or surprising to find on HN. To be honest it's largely the prevailing outlook from what I understand (maybe with some more reserved language) ES
19. 79.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    OP meaning the author of the linked article? Maybe I missed the mark but I felt his main rejection of Gmail ended up being because they train their AI based on his private and or commercial data.
20. 80.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    "please convince me otherwise, but keep in mind I have a very strongly held opinion that I consider to be an unshakeable fact, and by the way I'm asking you for evidence while providing none of my own. But it's a fact."
21. 81.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    But google still is presumably still training their AIs on your email content regardless if you don't use their frontend.
22. 82.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    Looks like this has been around for over a decade now. I'm surprised I haven't heard of it until now. If, as advertised, it's significantly better than protobufs, why hasn't it gathered more steam/adoption? If prese
23. 83.▲
    Mount Algidus Station – 54,680 acres in NZ(sothebysrealty.com)

    2 points by noitpmeder 9mo ago|0 comments
24. 84.▲
    by noitpmeder 9mo ago

    You mean South Amerizuela
25. 85.▲
    by noitpmeder 10mo ago

    I mean their livelihood is predicated on it not being solved for a portion of the population
26. 86.▲
    by noitpmeder 10mo ago

    Any ideas how I can track support for this in firefox?
27. 87.▲
    by noitpmeder 10mo ago

    This is absolutely FUD. Most engineers don't work at FAANG. Most _good_ engineers DONT work at FAANG. FAANG is still composed of almost all good engineers. Most software engineers are NOT _good_. All of these things are simultaneously
28. 88.▲
    by noitpmeder 10mo ago

    You could use that same statistic for literally every protest ever, doesn't mean they're not worth the causes
29. 89.▲
    by noitpmeder 10mo ago

    Citations on this?
30. 90.▲
    by noitpmeder 10mo ago

    At least the URL immediately calls out the fact the site is nothing but AI spew.