Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noitpmeder
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Imo it's not out of place in context if one is trying to determine if the candidate has an interest in finance. Now, I'm not disqualifying them if they dont read the journal. But if they can't demonstrate any proactive intere
92.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
I'm not sure I follow. In this instance we're talking about multiple backend matching engines... Correct? By definition they must be kept in sync, or at least have total omnipotent knowledge about the state of all other backend bo
93.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
How to Speedrun devaluing the credentials your institution exists to award.
94.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
For your pet project? No. For something you're building for others to use? Almost certainly yes.
95.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Off the cuff, id expect this leads to less improvement than you might think. The vast majority of orders, especially orders arriving in sequence close to one another, are likely on a small set of extremely liquid symbols, and usually all fo
96.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Thanks for all the info! I'm a front office engineer at a prop firm -- always interesting to get insight into how others do it. We have fairly similar parallels, maybe with the exception of throwing new exchange connections to the dedi
97.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Curious what your actual role was -- sounds very interesting! Project manager? Dev? Operations specialist? E.g. were you hired into this role, and what were the requisites?
98.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Obviously you're being facetious, that is not at all what that poster is claiming. While I agree that entering a dark alley shouldn't result in ill effects, if ill effects happen in said dark alley it is still worth the discussion
99.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
But you see, when these rule were being framed bad actors PLANNED on exploiting the checkerboard to expand their effective control. (Or at least it seems so obvious of an issue that I have to imagine _someone_ was scheming along these lines
100.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Which venta are you referencing here?
101.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
That instantly kills the patient -- "But you asked me to remove his pain"
102.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Just because they're better at writing CS algorithms doesn't mean they're taking steps closer to anything resembling AGI.
103.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
I'd say my expectation is papers should be minimal in their effect, and compounding. If your project proves new facts, either they should be clearly enumerable (with as much specificity as possible), or your project/presentation&#
104.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
The president isnt going to personally enrich himself and his cronies by _divesting_ power from his offce
105.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Apparently popular enough to get him elected. It's not like his supporters were under any pretense who or what they were voting for
106.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
But it's not like AI did any of that...
107.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
I mean you can't fault them for that approach. Obviously we would all like a full post mortem from the home dept side, but in today's litigious shareholder-value-driven world their response is the correct one.
108.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Because defending civilians who Israel is targeting is, in today's world, considered antisemitic
109.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
How about we just stop socializing with Israel and its supporters while we're at it
110.
▲
by
noitpmeder
10mo ago
Who the hell cares what garbage chatgpt vomited based on your unspecified chain of prompts?
111.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
I'd go one further and say all published papers should come with a clear list of "claimed truths", and one is only able to cite said paper if they are linking in to an explicit truth. Then you can build a true hierarchy of ci
112.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
You'll have to give some context. What did hella mean? How many months of your current spend rate do you have in the bank?
113.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
Not sure it's clear they will learn anything.... My impression was they were winning or settling these suits
114.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
Agreed. I'd love to have some of whatever copium the GP is smoking... Or be half as sure about many things as they are about this insane speculation.
115.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
What do you feel you cannot share concerns with your peers?
116.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
It is truly unfortunate for you that your actions have probably tainted your future open source contributions for a long time.
117.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
Economies of scale
118.
▲
Robinhood, Susquehanna Escalate Prediction-Market Arms Race
(bloomberg.com)
2 points
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
|
1 comments
119.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
https://archive.is/5vFW2
120.
▲
by
noitpmeder
11mo ago
I don't know about _squillions_, but numpy definitely has _requirements_, even if they're not represented as such in the python graph. e.g. https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/main/.gitmodule
More ›