Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nlh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
86 ms
·
751.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Name-calling doesn't really add to the conversation.
752.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Great question! I've radically changed my routine since moving to SF (~1.5 years ago) - love my current one. Two versions 1) (3-4 days a week) - Wake up 6:30-6:45. - Bathroom - Put in contacts, brush teeth - Put on shoes & sweats
753.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Agreed - I've used GA for many years and it's indeed extremely powerful (especially for a free tool). And the tradeoff is fair, I think -- Google gives us a ton of power to analyze site data in exchange for, well, Google being ab
754.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
A quick spin through Segment.com's list of integrations show a TON of GA-like services. Anyone have any suggestions for an alternative to GA that provides the same type of data without the sampling / bloat / etc of GA?
755.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
It's interesting -- I'd read about this story before but hadn't seen the actual picture. If you have even a mild sense of off-color humor it's really not that bad (I get the joke even without being "in" on it.)
756.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
While it's a fun idea, I'm skeptical (though it would be cool!) I think it's far more likely that Apple ends up either designing a car for Tesla or, less-spectacularly, "powering" a car (which basically means expa
757.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
A related question I had was whether the Coast Guard resents doing this sort of work - "ugh, another idiot who got himself into trouble." In particular in the context of sailors and kiteboarders who get stuck in SF bay. The answe
758.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
I'm presuming the negative results they saw from "rendering with JavaScript" meant, specifically, they moved certain page rendering tasks to the client side vs. server side. (It wasn't explicitly clear that was the case
759.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
I think you're exactly right. Smart contacts are going to be the next huge computing revolution (punch-cards/no screen -> screen in front of you/keyboard -> small screen in your hand - > virtual big screen on your c
760.
▲
The Power of Saying No
(timharford.com)
1 points
by
nlh
12y ago
|
0 comments
761.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Well, yes, but there's an argument to be made that while your cycle is certainly correct, the starting and ending points aren't necessarily fixed. Why not: More ads -> more $$ -> more information -> more organization ->
762.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Very cool. Nerd question -- can you talk a bit about how you made it? Tech stack used, etc.? Always curious about that stuff, especially when on Show HN.
763.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
I agree with that perspective completely. The problem is that the people who are generally the most blindly pro-government say something like: "I've got no problem with that. I have nothing to hide." (I have a friend who sa
764.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Excellent points. Thanks. First let me clarify that I agree the notion of "banning encryption" is misguided and wrong. I'm looking at Obama's position (perhaps incorrectly) as "we need to be able to have backdoors
765.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
An excellent point. I don't know if it's true. The government is certainly arguing it's true. How do we test that?
766.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
This is a great reply. Thank you. My thoughts based on it: 1) It's a tough sell to Average Joe. Average Joe wants it both ways - he wants Liberty AND to be protected from bad guys. Obama etc. were effectively hired to protect Avera
767.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Allow me to ask what I'm certain is an incredibly naive question, so please bear with me. But it's a question that the average / non-tech folks ARE asking, and I'm not looking to be attacked, I'm looking for an inte
768.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
I'm not the OP (and, btw, would love to hear the real answer) but having been through the exact same process (both the "it should only take an hour" and "wow how did that take 12 hours?" parts), here's my gener
769.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
> "FIG. 2. A simple toy model for determining the cumulative probability of finding a match as an urn model." As if modeling love in an algorithm isn't nerdy enough, leave it to the scientists to demonstrate that model usi
770.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Very fair point. Perhaps my example wasn't the best of "fluff" -- but my point is still that the language of this deck is still (relatively) plain and to the point, and that should be a common goal. In general, I've fou
771.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
This is a terrific deck (and thank you guys for open sourcing it, even in redacted form - an excellent compromise that's totally fair.) Take note of a few things: * They don't use BS "corporate speak" -- no synergies of
772.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Agreed 100%. This would be hugely helpful for me (and others I hope): I get where Angular shines (heavy-lifting for single-page apps). The part I'm missing is how to do the day-to-day jQuery stuff in Angular. Change CSS classes on
773.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
That's awesome. Question: Could those post-degree auditors get any credit for those classes? Or was it simply for the content?
774.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
"Adult Education" has this nagging stigma associated with it (though, thankfully, that's changing due to MOOCs and such). But still -- even when the major universities offer it, it's seen with a skewed tilt by much of t
775.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
I remember seeing this posted on Quora a while ago and it still stands out as one of the best answers I've ever read. And the biggest takeaway for me was (and still is): "Redundancy. Aircraft manufacturers are really, really (real
776.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Sorry, bad choice of words on my part -- I shouldn't have said "any rational investor". What I meant is "any profit-focused, long-term investor" (as opposed to a moonshot-focused VC investor). I don't mean an
777.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Funny - you did exactly the same thing I did while reading the article - our spreadsheets are basically identical :) So here's my thoughts -- I think some outside "real world" perspective is needed here. While 9% M-M growth
778.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
"There’s no computer algorithm that can..." "Yet", my friends, "yet". I love reading quotes like that because it speaks to pure opportunity. Someone will eventually figure out an algorithmic solution to X, a
779.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
Although my 8 days as the CEO of reddit have been sort of fun, I am happy they are coming to a close and I am sure the new team will do a far better job and take reddit to great heights. Heh.."sort of". But seriously - good mov
780.
▲
by
nlh
12y ago
At the risk of sounding like a fool, I offer the following: I've looked at the Github page, read the README, and skimmed the documentation.... ...and I still have _absolutely_ no idea what this does or what its intended purpose is. No
More ›