nhumrich

7 ms·

61.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Phase-2 being what? demo day?
62.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Except that all acceptance via YC is actually done remotely. They don't meet you in person until after they have already wired the money.
63.
by nhumrich 1y ago
I have heard this from a lot of people, yet here I am, using a terminal that supports this, and have yet to ever do it. Can you help me understand what workflows you depend on Ctrl+f for? I wonder if I am missing something big.
64.
by nhumrich 1y ago
> there is nowhere to go with phones than thinner Umm, smaller? We don't need thinner, we need smaller.
65.
by nhumrich 1y ago
I have a raspi sitting idle and would love to use it to run this! What are common solutions for backups? I would hate to lose all my photos. Is buying a Synology the only option?
66.
by nhumrich 1y ago
So, typer than
67.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Let me try: "outdated and groundless"
68.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Joplin
69.
by nhumrich 1y ago
CPython core devs. Specifically talking about the CPython code base. Hence, the namespace comment, which doesn't really make sense in a purely python context.
70.
by nhumrich 1y ago
GPU/c-bindings. Python packaging for for Python only modules has never been a problem. When people say they hate python packaging they are usually talking about being able to successfully install dependencies without much thinking. Bu
71.
by nhumrich 1y ago
People misunderstand the target audience and code base for the zen of python
72.
by nhumrich 1y ago
You can setup notify to run as a trigger on an events table. The job that listens shouldn't need a pool, it's a long lived connection anyway. Now you can keep using pgbouncer everywhere else.
73.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Since this is touching Linux, and Linux is copy left, they _have_ to do this.
74.
by nhumrich 1y ago
> code is not an asset—it's a liability Yes, this. 100% this. The goal is for a program to serve a goal/purpose with the least a amount of code possible. AI does the exact opposite. Now that code generation is easy, there is no
75.
by nhumrich 1y ago
WSL is so incredible. But support for it from 3rd party dev tools is so terrible.
76.
by nhumrich 1y ago
This model already has a name: pre-rendered.
77.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Try out Junie
78.
by nhumrich 1y ago
This looks like a performance nightmare, and would likely never have IDE integration. So I guess I was wrong. It could be a library. But will be much better supported officially.
79.
by nhumrich 1y ago
You should check out PEP 787
80.
by nhumrich 1y ago
We're at a point where the current generation of programmers weren't even _alive_ when that happened.
81.
by nhumrich 1y ago
Yep. Probably worth it. You could also do this with a monkeypatch method to "opt in" to this change.
82.
by nhumrich 1y ago
It's for SQL, HTML, and shell. But idk how solving injection, a top on the OWASP list forever is considered "overkill".
83.
by nhumrich 1y ago
No. F-strings should still be the default. T-strings aren't usable directly, and don't have a `str` like API, so they aren't even compatible, intentionally.
84.
by nhumrich 1y ago
I for one think python has never been better.
85.
by nhumrich 1y ago
I suggest you read the PEP, there is a section on i18n. Short version is it's not designed for this use case. As for variables and arbitrary code/lambdas, yes: t-strings can do that, just like f-strings
86.
by nhumrich 1y ago
This feature actually can't be a library. It needs to be able to preserve the string before the variables are passed in, which a library would be unable to do because f-strings immediately replace all the values. The whole premise of t
87.
by nhumrich 1y ago
For me, this is the best feature to land in python for 6 years. JS has had this and it allows my code to be completely safe from SQL injection, which is an absolutely incredible feature, given SQL injection has been the #1 vulnerability for
88.
by nhumrich 1y ago
This was the original proposed idea in the PEP (750), but it changed overtime. There is a section in the PEP to explain why it changed to t-strings if you are interested.
89.
by nhumrich 1y ago
The PEP was initially proposed this way. But due to various reasons, making it an open namespace was considered to overcomplicate the language (read: understanding coffee when reading it). Alternatively, there doesn't really seem to be
90.
by nhumrich 2y ago
I think OP might be hinting at cursor.

More ›