4 ms·

You should check out PEP 787

• tetha 1y ago
  Hmm, PEP-787 has some interesting discussions around it. I'll have to sort my thoughts on these aspects a bit.
• pauleveritt 1y ago
  We really should just point most of these comments at that PEP. Thanks for getting it out so fast.
• zahlman 1y ago
  Oh! I missed this one because I've been looking specifically at the Packaging forum rather than the PEPs forum. This looks like a brilliant use case. (I'm aiming for wide compatibility - back to 3.6 - with my current projects, but I look forward to trying this out if and when it's accepted and implemented.) Now if only the overall `subprocess` interface weren't so complex....
• Flimm 1y ago
  PEP 787 – Safer subprocess usage using t-strings https://peps.python.org/pep-0787/ https://peps.python.org/pep-0787/