ng12

89 ms·

961.
by ng12 7y ago
> If that was the case, then why did their policies include the murder of millions of German-speaking Jews, Gypsies, and people with disabilities. Because Jews and Gypsies weren't considered ethnically German. Re: disabilities, it&#
962.
by ng12 7y ago
Well, they didn't think of anyone as "white" in a meaningful way. They were primarily concerned with Pan-Germanicism.
963.
by ng12 7y ago
> Fascism was not "reactionary" Fascists gained power in Italy, Germany, and Spain as a direct result of anti-communist sentiment (and in the case of Germany, a failed communist revolution). Mussolini's early writings were
964.
by ng12 7y ago
I'll never understand this reductionist argument. Yes, YouTube/Facebook/Salesforce/etc can do whatever they want. That doesn't mean that it's good for society or that it's not worth talking about.
965.
by ng12 7y ago
The battleground was fascism vs. capitalism vs. communism. Fascism was, at it's core, reactionairy to the rise of communism and it's dishonest to describe it simply as "white nationalism". Furthermore, for a "white
966.
by ng12 7y ago
Facebook, Twitter, Google, Bing, Snapchat. I could maybe buy some advertising space directly from the Toronto Star. Google's probably the best but being better than your competition or offering products they don't doesn't mak
967.
by ng12 7y ago
> Google has 90% of the search market. I can use Bing. I can use DuckDuckGo. I just don't want to. However, I've been a Verizon customer for almost a decade against my will.
968.
by ng12 7y ago
@observable/useState/React.Component.state are all conceptually identical, just with varying implementations of the magic. All of them summon an observable value from the void and provide some method of updating said observable. T
969.
by ng12 7y ago
What's the difference between a class and a function with local state? (Semantics aside, either way this behavior is implemented in React via useState or setState, MobX has nothing to do with it)
970.
by ng12 7y ago
I think it's a closer analogue to React.useState.
971.
by ng12 7y ago
This has nothing to do with Redux. Redux is about storing global data, nothing more.
972.
by ng12 7y ago
I'm sure they make a killing on undergrads though. I can't imagine losing money when you're paying adjuncts a few grand to teach a class of 60 students.
973.
by ng12 7y ago
Kefir is absolutely magical. I highly recommend it to anyone experiencing digestive issues.
974.
by ng12 7y ago
> Mediocrity + two years of tech experience = six figures. Kids who can code and are two years out of school, who are mediocre, are making $100,000-plus in the market This has been true for almost a decade at this point.
975.
by ng12 7y ago
No, but one that's highly interactive and is constantly re-fetching/updating data does.
976.
by ng12 7y ago
From my experience, learning React and picking an approach for each of the above is faster than learning Angular.
977.
by ng12 7y ago
Most test frameworks allow you to stub imports. DI is just one of the many wheels Angular has reinvented.
978.
by ng12 7y ago
React really hasn't changed much since React.Component was introduced. Some lifecycle methods were deprecated/replaced, and hooks were added. That's honestly about it.
979.
by ng12 7y ago
Hooks are used for abstracting component state logic. React is just as agnostic concerning how you implement your business logic as ever.
980.
by ng12 7y ago
> embracing TypeScript There's been a huge React/TypeScript community since day one, even before Angular2 was released with TypeScript. The only difference is it's optional with React. > creating injectable shared state
981.
by ng12 7y ago
I've spend the last decade building highly dynamic data visualization applications. Building them server-side would be a huge pain.
982.
by ng12 7y ago
> React seems far more like a project created by people who dislike front-end development This is a really poor characterization. I started using React because I love front-end and it was exactly what I wanted front-end development to be
983.
by ng12 7y ago
Because it's literally business as usual. Companies do not have to offer benefits in the US, Google or no.
984.
by ng12 7y ago
Why would you want to use slots, then? It's just extra steps for the same functionality. > The whole idea of renderless is to move beyond this very limited and crude approach for library code where you might need to override only sm
985.
by ng12 7y ago
> The only difference is naming and minor semantics differences I don't agree at all. There are no naming/semantics for doing renderless in React. React has no analogue for "slots" because it's just naturally par
986.
by ng12 7y ago
Impartial as in it's not treating certain types of content differently. It's one thing if "the algorithm" decided to push (or censor) an anti-Pelosi agenda across the board, another if it pushes anti-Pelosi content to pe
987.
by ng12 7y ago
Corporate censorship built in to my browser? I'll pass.
988.
by ng12 7y ago
Why do we expect people to make this distinction for TV but not for things they read on the internet?
989.
by ng12 7y ago
But "the algorithm" is impartial. Editorialized content implies there's a message being driven.
990.
by ng12 7y ago
Agreed, except Facebook is not a news distributor.

More ›