neya

18 ms·

391.
by neya 8mo ago
It's not that hard to find out. Copy paste the text into any AI detector online. I pasted it into Grammarly and it says it's AI content with a 99% accuracy. Easiest way, however - any article that uses em dashes instead of regular
392.
by neya 8mo ago
This isn't upvoted enough. This is more interesting than the OP's project! Thanks for sharing!
393.
by neya 8mo ago
> the gatekeeping has now been removed Nobody gatekept anything. The software, tools, knowledgebase (MIT, Coursera, etc) were always there. It was a choice. Some of us chose it, rest didn't for whatever reason.
394.
by neya 8mo ago
All your points are valid and I myself use these types of apps (eg. For handling invoices) internally. But, the second your app talks to the internet, you are more likely to shoot yourself in the foot. Look what happened to Clawdbot. Everyo
395.
by neya 8mo ago
https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/researchers-40000... Actually this number was updated to 135,000 exposed instances recently
396.
by neya 8mo ago
> it costs almost nothing to build an app, it costs almost nothing to clone an app. I guess the author hasn't done real software development. The cost isn't just for the code. It's for the whole process - especially the ar
397.
by neya 8mo ago
Yeah but Google always allowed you to bypass that by allowing users to install apps outside of their store. Whereas Apple pitched it as a security concern only to allow whoever paid them a nice fat commission
398.
by neya 8mo ago
But the argument is not about market validation, the argument is about software quality. Vibe coders love shitting on experienced software folks until their code starts falling apart the moment there is any real world usage. And about the p
399.
by neya 8mo ago
How does Apple allow this? Here I thought the App Store was supposedly superior to the Android eco-system and that's why Apple justified the insane 30% tax on developers back then
400.
by neya 8mo ago
100% accurate. The architect matters so much more than people think. The most common counter argument to this I've seen on reddit are the vibe coders (particularly inside v0 and lovable subreddits) claiming they built an app that makes
401.
by neya 8mo ago
Ars Technica has always trash even before LLMs and is mostly an advertisement hub for the highest bidder
402.
by neya 8mo ago
I built a windmill with Claude. I created a skills.md and followed everything by the book. But now, I have to supply power to keep the windmill running. What am I doing wrong?
403.
by neya 8mo ago
Thanks!
404.
by neya 8mo ago
You're right, I absolutely was mixing them both. Thanks for clarifying!
405.
by neya 8mo ago
I asked because that's the average power consumption of an average household in the US per day. So, if that figure is per hour, that's equivalent to one household worth of power consumption per hour...which is a lot.
406.
by neya 8mo ago
20KW? Wow. That's a lot of power. Is that figure per hour?
407.
by neya 8mo ago
Here's a different take - there is not really a way to prove that the AI agent autonomously published that blog post. What if there was a real person who actually instructed the AI out of spite? I think it was some junior dev running C
408.
by neya 8mo ago
I agree completely. This sort of emotional immaturity was acceptable a decade ago. But today? They are behind everything. I have 3 Macs, 2 iPads and 1 iPhone and their software is sh*t. iPad pro is a joke. It should be illegal to use the la
409.
by neya 8mo ago
All good :)
410.
by neya 8mo ago
Wow, I didn't know this. Thanks for sharing!
411.
by neya 8mo ago
Sure, referencing a meme in a language relate discourse, should make people take you seriously /s >About > I pronounce my name as kroo-PAH-krun. In IPA it’s /kruːˈpɑːkrən/ Rules for thee, but not for me :))))
412.
by neya 8mo ago
"I think it's exactly the opposite, actually. They've integrated AI flawlessly into existing products to an extent nobody else has even come close to. Photos, for instance" Have you used a Samsung? Apple's AI misera
413.
by neya 8mo ago
100% agreed. You speak the truth, but already the apologists are writing textbooks justifying Apple's failed strategy :)) and this is why the company thrives. Just blind loyalty to a company that couldn't care less about them.
414.
by neya 8mo ago
As someone who moved from Heroku -> App Engine -> Cloud Run, I think you'll appreciate the modern alternatives more. If you remove the cost factor, the development experience within GCP is far superior. Not to mention the securit
415.
by neya 8mo ago
I hate it when people mispronounce/misspell Yazhi. It's pronounced using the the most unique feature of the language - "zh" instead of "L" just like Tamil itself (it's actually Thamizh). The original wikip
416.
by neya 8mo ago
Nobody is going to even do anything about SimilarWeb for pulling this off? My understanding from the article is that they're actively behind this. When I was the CTO in a previous role, SimilarWeb approached us. I read through the cod
417.
by neya 8mo ago
My understanding is that it's just an abstraction layer that feeds right into the context window. Might as well just feed it into the prompt. I think cursor even proved that skills aren't as good as direct prompts (or something to
418.
by neya 8mo ago
So, we just discard someone's workmanship history and dump $x,00,000 just because of the brand value? 3 years ago but still relevant for a company who charges $500k for such poor workmanship. This is acceptable from a normal manufactur
419.
by neya 8mo ago
False equivalence. You are confusing algorithms and intellegince. If you want human level intelligence without the human aspect, then use algorithms - like used in Excel and Calculators. Repeatable, reliable, 0 opinions. If you want some so
420.
by neya 8mo ago
I completely disagree. Gemini is by far the most straightforward AI. The other two are too soft. ChatGPT particularly is extremely politically correct all the time. It won't call a spade, one. Gemini has even insulted me - just to get

More ›